SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: long-gone who wrote (74851)8/12/2001 1:32:25 AM
From: clochard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116768
 
<<Don't most still believe Neanderthal were a separate & distinct species from Homo Sapiens ?>>

Oh now we are bashing Neanderthals again, are we?? -g-



To: long-gone who wrote (74851)8/12/2001 8:56:03 AM
From: IngotWeTrust  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116768
 
RH sez re: Neanderthals: >>Don't most still believe Neanderthal were a separate & distinct species from Homo Sapiens ? <<

HARDLY! Look how many of them still hang out here...

ak ak ak, cheep, cheep, cheep, ak ak ak, aw hell, I like YEEEEEEhaw better

gold_tutor



To: long-gone who wrote (74851)8/12/2001 4:44:00 PM
From: John Soileau  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 116768
 
OT Neanderthal man is a subspecies, not a different species. They were Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, we (or at least most posters on this thread!) are Homo sapiens sapiens, modern man. As our subspecies appeared, neanderthalensis declined and ultimately disappeared. The big question is why. Maybe they were wiped out, maybe they assimilated into modern man (sometimes I see a person with a pronounced brow and that makes me lean toward the assimilation theory). The two subspecies were together in W Europe for a very long time, those neanderthal maidens must have looked pretty good to a redblooded sapiens sapiens warrior. Interesting and I think pretty open question.
John