SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : ADSL IS DEAD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: zbyslaw owczarczyk who wrote (98)11/7/2001 11:03:15 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 135
 
Broadband defectors on the rise
By John Borland
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
November 7, 2001, 4:00 a.m. PT
Katy Ling, a software consultant who had her home wired for high-speed Internet access last year, did what many technology analysts said would never happen: She bailed out of broadband.

The San Francisco resident subscribed to Pacific Bell's digital subscriber line (DSL) service in 2000, mainly because she was telecommuting for work at a San Diego-based start-up. She also used it to rent movies from Kozmo, buy airline tickets and check movie show times. But when she left her job, she decided that she couldn't justify the $50 monthly DSL fee.

"I used it regularly in the beginning and then the use started rapidly declining, so I got rid of it," Ling said. "It was easier justifying a recreational DSL line when there was a lot of money around to burn."

Ling isn't the only person to dump DSL or cancel cable. For years, Internet marketing executives have presumed that broadband connections would drive future growth of e-commerce and telecommunications, but consumers are starting to question that fundamental assumption.

It's unclear whether defectors--especially those crimped by massive layoffs in the technology industry--will eventually re-subscribe. But the sour economy, broadband price hikes, and a continuing dearth of online content are prompting some adopters to cancel their high-speed connections. It's an unwelcome sign for Internet service providers (ISPs), which are looking for high-speed subscriptions' profit margins to bolster their bottom line and stave off trips to the bankruptcy court.

While many ISPs remain publicly adamant that broadband subscribers are rock-steady, some say privately that signs of cancellations are emerging. The impact is noticeable in the San Francisco Bay Area, where thousands of high-tech employees have lost their jobs.

"Particularly since Sept. 11, a lot of people are deciding which bills to cut out," said a spokesperson for one major California-based ISP, who asked not to be named. "People are freaked out."

So far, cancellations haven't shown up in macro-level statistics such as earnings reports. But that's mainly because broadband providers report quarterly growth in the overall number of subscribers; they don't report the number of defectors, also known as "churn."

Still, several analysts say that ISPs should take heed of early defectors--especially as the companies try to get customers other than the tech-savvy early adopters and telecommuters who now dominate broadband.

"I think the churn is just now beginning," adds Imran Khan, a Yankee Group research analyst.

Rising churn rates would be the latest hurdle for strapped broadband providers. Analysts say operating margins excluding sales and marketing expenses for cable modem subscribers are as low as 5 percent, and they say DSL is break-even at best. Many ISPs--including Flashcom, PSINet, Covad Communications, NorthPoint Communications and Rhythms Links--filed for bankruptcy protection earlier this year.

In one of the most high-profile bankruptcy filings, broadband and content provider Excite@Home accounced on Oct. 1 it intended to sell its assets to AT&T. The telephone giant is trying to buy the cable assets of the struggling company for $307 million, but angry creditors are trying to thwart the deal, leaving the company and its subscribers in limbo.

Selling grandma to pay for DSL
To be sure, broadband providers insist that cancellation rates are extremely low. New subscriber growth has slowed in recent months, but ISPs, telecom and cable companies say demand is still strong.

EarthLink spokesman Kurt Rahn says that high-speed subscribers would "rather sell their grandmothers" than go back to a pokey dial-up connection. With 14 percent of its revenue now coming from broadband, EarthLink is increasingly relying on high-speed Net subscriptions.

Tom Osha, a spokesman for smaller phone company Broadwing, agreed. "Our churn rate has stayed pretty consistent," he said.

Jupiter Research predicts that 10 million households in the United States will have a high-speed Net connection by the end of this year, up from 5.2 million in 2000. That figure will rise to 35.1 million households by 2006, the company predicts.

But some consumers are finding they can do their Internet business using their office's fast connection, rather than at home. Most large corporations have broadband connections, and many of them are significantly faster than home DSL or cable connections.

"You'd rather finish what you need (to) at work and then go home and not look at a computer," said Maricor Abao, another former DSL subscriber in San Francisco who instead uses high-speed access at his financial software company.

One of the biggest disincentives for Abao and other would-be broadband subscribers is its price tag, which continues to climb.

In May, AT&T announced it would raise monthly cable modem Internet fees by $6 per month, to $45.95 for most of its nearly 1.3 million customers. The following month, Cox Communications informed more than half of its 587,000 customers that their monthly fee will increase by $5 per month. Although pricing varies by city, on average most customers are now paying $44.95 per month, up from $39.95 per month.

And earlier this year, providers of DSL service, such as SBC Communications and EarthLink, raised their high-speed Net access rates to about $50 per month.

"It's difficult to push a $50 broadband product into the mainstream," Khan said.

Others are defecting from DSL and cable because they simply don't see the need if they're using the Internet primarily for e-mail, instant messaging and ordering items from online retailers. Analysts say no "killer app" has developed that helps justify paying more than twice the cost of a dial-up connection.

According to a recent Jupiter Research study, fewer than half of broadband subscribers used their connections to download music, listen to streamed audio online, or watch video--the most bandwidth-heavy multimedia applications.

The demise of Napster, a popular music-swapping service that ran into legal trouble last year, may also portend a stall in broadband demand.

Napster was the undisputed king of online music last year, with 64 million registered users trading billions of files a month. To download, store and listen to MP3-encoded files, consumers purchased CD burners and larger hard drives--not to mention high-speed cable modems and DSL connections to get the songs in the first place.

But the service has been idle since July because of technical glitches due to a court order barring it from offering the trade of copyrighted material. The company's future seems increasingly in peril. Although few people signed up for broadband specifically because of Napster, legal issues surrounding the transmission of copyrighted material online cast a shadow on its status as a killer app for broadband.

Companies that still distribute multimedia content, such as Seattle's RealNetworks, say they aren't seeing any drop in users. RealNetworks' GoldPass program, which costs $9.95 a month, has attracted more than 400,000 subscribers in only a year. ISPs that point their subscribers to services like these could have an easier time keeping subscribers, those companies' executives say.

"The issue for broadband providers is: Can they put forth a powerful message for consumers?" said Scott Ehrlich, RealNetworks' vice president of programming. "It's not enough to say you can browse Amazon faster."

Searching for new business strategies
For broadband access providers, signs are far from gloomy yet. The broadband business is seeing some slowdowns in subscriber sign-ups, and financial troubles continue to dog many companies. But companies say demand remains strong.

Still, if more early adopters become early defectors and the economy slows further, ISPs and telecommunications companies could have to reconsider their business strategies, many of which were predicated on continued strong demand and double- or triple-digit yearly increases in customers. For years, the unquestioned mantra in the broadband business was, "Once you go broadband, you never go back."

SBC, one of the most ambitious phone companies, says it is reducing its broadband capital expenditure by 20 percent next year. That means the company, which hiked DSL rates to $49.95 per month in February, is retreating from its original "Project Pronto" goals of making DSL available to 80 percent of its phone customers by 2003.

The company blames that on regulation, not on declining demand. But a spokesman agreed that it has yet to find a widespread application that will fuel broadband subscriptions.

"People are still looking for the proverbial killer app," said SBC spokesman Joe Izbrand. But "once people get to the broadband market, they get hooked on it and don't go back."



To: zbyslaw owczarczyk who wrote (98)11/7/2001 11:10:22 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 135
 
Telefonica to offer wholesale Net access in Brazil. Before CLECs were fighting to get into this copper plant. Today it is the ILEC that is offering the obsolete technology.

Telefonica to offer wholesale Net access in Brazil

By Reuters staff

01 November 2001


Spain's Telefonica said on Wednesday it plans to open its fixed-line network in Brazil's Sao Paulo state to third-parties that want to offer fast-access Internet.

Telefonica's vice president for regulatory matters, Eduardo Navarro, said the company would unveil the terms of its new service in 60 days.

In general, the service should allow companies to offer high-speed ADSL Internet access through Telefonica's vast network in Sao Paulo state.

"This is another step toward a full unbundling," Navarro told reporters at the Futurecom 2001 telecommunications fair, in reference to the industry term for when a company opens its network to other parties.

ADSL, or asymmetric digital subscriber lines, allows customers to use the Internet at much higher speeds than traditional dial-up modems.

Telefonica had only offered to partially open its network, drawing the interest of companies like Diveo, LinkSat and Pegasus, although none has yet signed up.

Telefonica's decision to further open the network comes after Brazil's Anatel telecommunications regulator said companies needed to offer their competitors equal access to their networks.

Telefonica won the rights to operate fixed-line local telephone service in Sao Paulo state, Brazil's richest and most populous state, after the telephone company's 1998 privatization.

Telefonica counts some 11 million clients in Sao Paulo, 60,000 of which are already ADSL users.



To: zbyslaw owczarczyk who wrote (98)1/31/2002 10:36:13 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 135
 
Post-ADSL architecture

Arguments for Etherent in the First Mile (EFM) as discussed in EFMA as the market messages targeting ILECs and PTTs:

* EFM is the Post-ADSL architecture of choice.
* An all IP based access network is the most cost efficient solution for high BB penetrations.
* EFM is a single standard, covering multiple architectures, e.g. Copper, Fiber-P2P and Fiber PON.
* EFM has reached a level of maturity where ATM is not required to meet Carrier Class needs.
* EFM is the solution of choice for all green field infrastructure deployments.
EFM as a standard enable a retail distribution chain for the CPE for both copper and fiber devices.

POst ADSL? Oh, I see. It is dead then, isn't it?



To: zbyslaw owczarczyk who wrote (98)3/20/2002 11:19:43 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 135
 
VDSL - Closer to reality but far from convincing
Michelle Donegan
26 November 2001
Telcos think that very high bitrate DSL will help them compete with cable operators, but others have yet to be persuaded.

<<another flavor of DSL, when are they going to accept defeat?>>

A high-level industry working group is putting the finishing touches on a digital subscriber line implementation specification, which telecoms network operators hope will outclass cable technology in handling multimedia services.

Many telcos believe very high data rate digital subscriber lines (VDSL) will be the technology that stops their customers from defecting to cable operators, which at the moment can more easily offer the consumer broadband bundle of high-speed Internet, video and voice services.

But some analysts say an asymmetrical digital subscriber line (ADSL), with a downstream speed of 2.3 Megabits per second, is perfectly adequate to deliver near-broadcast quality TV channels, which they say is all that is required for video-on-demand (VOD) services.

"Telcos could asphyxiate if they hold their breath waiting for VDSL," said Tim Johnson, DSL industry consultant at Ovum Ltd., of London. "It's not just the standards question, but the whole business of adding a new layer of fiber to the network to support curbside cabinets. I think it makes sense to use ADSL for what ... it was originally designed for: video-on-demand."

The FS-VDSL Committee will complete its draft specifications for full service, very high bitrate DSL deployments at its plenary meeting in Rome next month. This could spur operators into rolling out VDSL technology in the second half of 2002.

"There's a commercial drive in big telcos and a desire to fight back against cable operators," said David Greggains, a director of the DSL Forum and director of Gorham & Partners management consultants, of London.

"And there really is only one way to do it and that's with VDSL."

Specs will spur growth
Launched in July last year, the FS-VDSL Committee is developing end-to-end implementation specifications for VDSL (CWI, 11 September 2000, p.18). The group works out issues like how much bandwidth should be allocated to each video stream, or how multiple video streams should be distributed inside a home to different TVs, i.e., via one box or several.

"If we can issue our specification on time, we hope that we'll provide a fillip to the industry to deploy VDSL. This could boost recovery," said Don Clarke, head of VDSL deployment at BT Exact and technical director of the FS-VDSL Committee.

VDSL standardization has been controversial from the start, with long-running disputes over the frequency plan and the line code. But the FS-VDSL Committee complements the work of standards bodies by working out specifications for implementation.

"There was a realization that you have to have an end-to-end specification from content aggregation right through to the TV in the home, plus certain operational support plans as well," said Clarke.

VDSL can deliver 26 Megabits per second over 4,000 feet of copper wire, which will allow for two to three video streams, plus data and voice.

The data rates are much higher than ADSL, but the distances are shorter.

This is why operators will need to build fiber out to street cabinets and then run VDSL over copper into homes. It can be asymmetrical or symmetrical, but early deployments are likely to be asymmetrical with a much slower upstream. "It's a question of getting the economics right for getting the fiber close enough to the homes," said Greggains, of Gorham & Partners.

Analysts don't expect significant VDSL deployments for some time. "It will probably be a couple of years before anything gets started with VDSL," said Beth Gage, vice president of consulting at Telechoice Inc., of Denver.

Meanwhile, operators are running VDSL trials (see box). Qwest in the United States leads the world with its VDSL trial in Phoenix, Arizona, and Highlands Ranch, Colorado. Qwest does not have plans yet for a broader rollout of VDSL. "We're currently evaluating the customer demand, costs of deployment, support and ongoing viability of the service," said a Qwest spokeswoman.

In Stavanger, Norway, Telenor has been offering 26 Mbps to 750 homes in a trial since November 2000. "We don't believe we can compete with satellite operators with lower bit rates," said Leif Ims, a project director and head of VDSL at Telenor, of Oslo. "Some operators will be disappointed (by) doing (VOD and broadcast TV) over ADSL."

Telecom Italia has also begun a small trial of VDSL in Turin, Milan and Rome.

VDSL TRIALS WORLDWIDE

- Bell Canada VDSL trial in luxury apartment building in Toronto; around 140 participants

- Qwest Limited deployments of VDSL to 50,000 subscribers in Phoenix, Arizona, and Highlands Ranch, Colorado. Service costs from $30-$79 per month for packages ranging from video channels to Internet access.

- Telecom Italia VDSL trial to about 100 people in Turin, Milan and Rome.

- Telenor VDSL trial with 750 homes in Stavanger, offering 26 Mbps. Also trial in Oslo offering 10 Mbps.

What do you think? Contact CWI at editorial@cwi.emap.com