SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: wanna_bmw who wrote (50820)8/12/2001 12:49:49 PM
From: andreas_wonischRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Wanna_bmw, Re: The value you have listed for the 1GHz Pentium III is what the processor dissipates under the unlikely scenario that every transistor switches simultaneously.

Yes, thanks for pointing that out. I believe that's what Intel is calling TDPmax in their data sheets (or in other words: the maximum power consumption possible) and it's of course not equal to TDP. However, I am not sure what AMD is specifying in their data sheets. If it's the "normal" TDP, those numbers can't be compared to Intel's. But unfortunately they are the only one in the sheets. Judging from the Athlon power consumption an Athlon 4 at 1 GHz should consume a maximum of around 31W (lower voltage + 20% power reduction because of the core redesign).

Andreas



To: wanna_bmw who wrote (50820)8/12/2001 3:50:21 PM
From: Mani1Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Re <<...processor dissipates under the unlikely scenario that every transistor switches simultaneously. >>

That is not possible, just by how a processor works. At any given time a small fraction of transistors are switching.

That number (34.0W) is experimental. They run software like CAD, photoshop or multimedia and measure the output from the CPU.

Mani