SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rich1 who wrote (77272)8/12/2001 9:24:05 PM
From: cordob  Respond to of 93625
 
Had a 100 to read and eliminated 2/3 of them...LOL

But did you get any information??

Cheers
Cor



To: Rich1 who wrote (77272)8/12/2001 11:42:49 PM
From: JD_Canuck  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Rich1: I was tempted to ignore them, but then there was so little to read, and i missed all the humour.

By the way...where is Bilow? does he get Sundays and Mondays off? You would think he would leave some items prewritten and have his staff post them at regular intervals.....i see he's slipping.



To: Rich1 who wrote (77272)8/13/2001 11:50:58 AM
From: Don Green  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Buy.com confirms Intel's next price cuts, 2GHz P4
By Tony Smith
Posted: 13/08/2001 at 11:13 GMT

Intel's upcoming 2GHz Pentium 4 has begun to appear on Web retailers' catalogues ready for its official release on 26 August - in just under two weeks' time.

US online store Buy.com has the 2GHz, 256KB on-die L2 cache chip - Intel part number BX80531NK200G - on its Web site here. It's certainly the Socket 478 part - the version designed for the i845 chipset (aka Brookdale), though the blurb refers to the Socket 423 chip, presumably for Intel's Rambus RDRAM-based i850 chipset.

Buy.com wants $626.95 for the 2GHz P4, a nice mark-up on the $562 Intel is expected to charge PC makers for the part, albeit in batches of 1000 processors.

The 2GHz P4 is expected to launch on 26 August, alongside a 1.9GHz part, which Buy.com has in both Socket 423 (part number BX80528JK190G) and Socket 478 (part number BX80531NK190G) forms. Both 1.9GHz parts cost $421.95 from Buy.com. Intel's PC OEM price is $375 (again, in batches of 1000 chips).

Interestingly, Buy.com is offering the 1.8GHz P4 (Socket 478, part number BX80531NK180G) for $290.95 here. Now, since this currently ships to PC OEMs for $562 and is expected to fall to $256 - a cut of 55 per cent - on 26 August, Buy.com has nicely confirmed Intel's next round of price reductions ahead of their official announcement into the bargain.

Buy.com is also offering on pre-order an Intel Socket 478 mobo based on the Rambus-supporting i850 chipset for the princely sum of $176.95 (Intel part number BOXD850MVL). ®

Thanks to reader Ken Knierim for the tip-off



To: Rich1 who wrote (77272)8/13/2001 11:57:52 AM
From: Don Green  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
The TSC Streetside Chat: Benjamin Anixter of Advanced Micro Devices
By Chris Frankie
Staff Reporter
Originally posted at 11:14 AM ET 8/11/01 on RealMoney.com


Many forecasters said the chip sector would turn around in the second half of the year. Now, well into the third quarter, there are few indications that a reversal is imminent. And Intel (INTC:Nasdaq - news - commentary) and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD:NYSE - news - commentary) are mired in a pricing slugfest that could bruise both companies' margins.

Lehman Brothers' analyst Dan Niles wrote in a recent research note that Intel is "planning to detonate a price bomb on Advanced Micro Devices by cutting prices about 50% on high-end [Pentium 4] processors." He added that "for those who thought the price war was already aggressive, you haven't seen anything yet."

TheStreet.com spoke this week with Benjamin Anixter, vice president of external affairs at AMD, about a number of issues affecting the company and the semiconductor industry. Anixter has been with AMD, where he is responsible for industry affairs, government affairs and investor relations, since 1971. He has seen everything the chip sector has to offer, and he shared with us his thoughts on the current state of affairs. (This interview has been edited for length and clarity.)

TheStreet.com: Do you think Intel can outlast AMD in terms of price-cutting? How long can you sustain lower margins in a price war?

Benjamin Anixter: I don't know that this is a price war with us. The big problem they have is that the Pentium 4 is a very undesirable product. And in this particular generation, they have to get the prices low enough to be in the price points that people buy in. They have 75% of the business, and while they are trying to inhibit us from gaining market share, what they're really replacing on the desktop is the [Pentium III]. They're bringing the P4 prices into the area where the P3 was selling, so they're replacing the P3.

Their margins are getting hit, because the P4 is a much more expensive product to make than the P3. In the meantime, they're still trying to arrest our ability to gain or hold market share. But the Athlon [AMD's signature microprocessor] is a more desirable product, so they're stuck. Yes, it's very aggressive pricing; some people can call it a price war. But the problem is that it comes about not because of a price war but because they're trying to take an inferior product and force it into the marketplace, and that's the only way they can do it.

TheStreet.com: You just said the Athlon, your product, is a better one. Can you elaborate on that a little bit?

Benjamin Anixter: Clock speed doesn't necessarily mean what the performance is of the processor. The best example is Apple has the machines that are just as powerful as Microsoft Windows machines, but their clock speeds are only in the 500 to 600 megahertz range. The architecture of the Athlon 4 is much more powerful in generating performance that a person can see. If you use industry standard benchmarks generated by third parties -- not us, not Intel -- it turns out that a 1.3 gigahertz Athlon outperforms a 1.7 gigahertz P4. But the reality is we can only supply 25% of the market, so they're going to get 75% of the business, but they can't get 75% of the business unless they price it right. It's not helping us, because the average prices are putting pressure on our margins, but it's hurting Intel a lot.

And from the point of view of outlasting them, we have a very strong balance sheet. Last quarter we were profitable. We're about cash-flow neutral, so it's unlikely that anybody's going to put anybody else out of business.

TheStreet.com: You said last quarter you were profitable. Will you break even in the third quarter and turn a profit in the fourth quarter?

Benjamin Anixter: We actually forecast an operating loss in Q3. We had a goal of break-even but it would be very, very difficult to do. We said our sales would be down 10% to 15% this quarter, and we would have a rebound in Q4 and be solidly profitable in Q4.

TheStreet.com: At this point, are you seeing prices still coming down or stabilizing? If so, when do you see things starting to turn around?

Benjamin Anixter: Prices don't go up in processors. They continuously go down for a given clock speed. The blended average price goes down more slowly. Intel had four price cuts last quarter, they were very aggressive. And the major supplier in volume sets the price. We have a flat PC-processor market this year, so it's making it difficult in a soft market. We're going to get some growth next year. It will take a little bit of pressure off. But I do not foresee an end to lower prices.

TheStreet.com: The company previously said it would cut capital spending to $900 million from $1 billion. Do you see it being cut any more?

Benjamin Anixter: We have trimmed capex from $1 billion to $900 million. About half of the capex went to the build-out, or is going to the build-out of our Dresden, Germany, facility, which is where all of our Athlons are produced and where we're getting the equipment to go to .13 micron and start SLI production. Those expenditures have not been cut. The expenditures that have been cut are mostly in the back end, where the volume for flash memory is down, so we don't need as many testers, we don't need as much assembly. There's no program that's of importance to the company that's been cut.

TheStreet.com: Will R&D be one of the places that you might have to cut?

Benjamin Anixter: We will not cut expenditures on programs that are critical to our strategic operation. What you do is you reduce costs and you reduce other things.

TheStreet.com: How has the slowing of PC unit sales affected the company this year and might it for the remaining quarters?

Benjamin Anixter: For the first year in a long, long time, the PC processors required by the industry are flat compared to last year. They have been growing at the compound rate of between about 15% and 20%, and this year they've gone flat. And the reason for that is, we believe, the PC market is getting some fallout from the debacle in the communications market and the dot-com bubble bursting. And also, it's probably not shocked you to find that there's a recession in the United States, or at least in the economy in the United States and in Europe.

Now, for the first time ever, there's going to be fewer PCs sold in the United States this year than last. I will tell you, however, that overseas -- in Asia, India, South America and China and even Japan -- sales are up in units. And I think that when we get a little better economy here, Europe will quickly follow. So I think that next year, we will start to get the PC industry back on a growth path, and although it's a more mature industry, we would expect to see in the 10% to 15% unit growth next year. In the meantime this year, our unit sales are actually rising. We've gained market share, so we're going to have significantly higher unit sales this year than in last in PC processors.

TheStreet.com: You said you were gaining market share. Is that for the year, or are you still gaining market share quarter over quarter compared to Intel?

Benjamin Anixter: Last year we exited the year at about 17.5%. We had, depending on who you talk to, anywhere from 20.5% to 21% in Q1, and in Q2, we were something over 22%. And I think because of our more desirable product line, we've been able to gain market share.

TheStreet.com: Do you still think in Q3 you're gaining market share? Or were you talking in general terms for the year?

Benjamin Anixter: I was talking in general. The first two quarters, that's history. For the rest of the year, I think we'll at least hold market share and probably gain some. Because there are new markets that we're going into -- markets where we had no penetration or essentially no sales last year, such as the portable market, which is a very important product category in PC processors -- we're just starting to see the effect of those. So it's either going to help us gain more market share or mitigate any loss in market share in the desktop market.

TheStreet.com: What about flash memory? Chief Operating Officer Hector de Ruiz said you could see as much as a 30% drop-off in the third quarter.

Benjamin Anixter: What I think we said was that the company would be down in sales 10% to 15% this quarter over last quarter. We've also said publicly several times that we think the flash market, not our business, but the flash market in total, would be down 25% or 30% this year over last. We said Q3 flash memory sales for us would be down over Q2, but that we would get a significant bounce in Q4. So our sales would be down significantly less than 25% to 30%.

TheStreet.com: How do you foresee the company going about getting new customers in the next couple of quarters?

Benjamin Anixter: In the flash area, we have 25 supply agreements with the largest manufacturers in the world. And when the bottom fell out of the demand, and we were essentially tapped out of capacity, we could just barely fill our agreements to these 25 major customers. In the PC area, we're bringing out new products to get into new markets that we haven't been able to participate in. One that I mentioned earlier was the mobile market, where we have a better offering than Intel now, and that offering is being picked up wholesale by our existing customers and offered to the marketplace. We expect to do very well with that. We entered the low-end server and workstation market last quarter. And we're having some success in some markets overseas.

We've been through six of these downturns in the last 25 years. I could say there's maybe more intensity this time, but when you're in this kind of a market, you have to draw on your strengths and work that much harder.

TheStreet.com: When do you see the next big AMD chip coming out, the next big product?

Benjamin Anixter: The Athlon product is going to go through two generations between now and this time next year. The first generation, which we commence production on next quarter, is now only a couple of months away. That will give us a lower-power device, which will be good for notebooks, and also a fast product, which gives better performance. We'll also start production on the Hammer family, our eighth-generation machine. We'll have samples out by the end of this year, early samples.

TheStreet.com: You said your product is better, but regardless of that, Intel's name to an average person has a certain brand recognition. Does that at all worry you, and what is your company doing to fight that?

Benjamin Anixter: It worries us all the time. It's been worrying us as long as I've been at the company, and I've been here for 30 years. But I would point out there's a difference between brand recognition and brand preference. There's no question in my mind that Intel is one of the most well-known brands and is recognizable in the world. But if you do the next survey, about the preference, they don't do nearly as well. And we have been successful with our marketing programs worldwide and in all the geographies working with our customers to show our customers why they're better off. When people go to buy computers, they evaluate performance and value. We went out there, and that's why we're gaining market share. Remember, if we have a 25% market share in units, we're going to lose 75% of the business. So our goal being 30% of the market share, we'll still lose 70% of the business. And we'll win 30% of the business. It's never easy to compete against Intel, but we're doing it successfully.

TheStreet.com: In the last six months, AMD's stock has lost almost one-third of its price. In the last three months, it's dropped around 40%.

Benjamin Anixter: Well, we're still up for the year, and Intel is not. If you invested money in Intel a year ago, three years ago, five years ago, we would've been a better investment. The fact that they have a higher price-to-earnings ratio just means that people are not necessarily investing wisely. This is a cyclical business we're in, and we're in the worst down cycle in the history of our industry. You have to manage through these cycles, and right now we're doing very well in a very bad industry environment. Sales were down in the second quarter by 31%, according to the Semiconductor Industry Association. And in our PC processor and in our flash memory business, if you add them together, we were only down 11%. And these markets always do turn around. You go into these recessions for the same reason every time. This one is no different, it's just a little deeper. And when the market improves, we're well-positioned to come out of the market with new products, new technologies. And when business improves, our fortune will improve markedly.

thestreet.com



To: Rich1 who wrote (77272)8/14/2001 12:26:51 AM
From: Don Green  Respond to of 93625
 
DRAM free fall may not be halted by fab closures
By Jeanne Graham, EBN
Aug 13, 2001 (1:55 PM)
URL: ebnews.com

A recent spate of DRAM fab furloughs and shutdowns won't affect the supply side of the market enough to influence collapsing prices any time soon, according to industry executives and analysts.

Current fab utilization rates are running at about 40% for foundries and 70% for integrated device manufacturers, said Len Jelinek, an analyst at iSuppli Corp., El Segundo, Calif. “There's great reluctance by a lot of IDMs to shut down factories,” he said. “They're running factories high to cover costs.”

With the glut of capacity that came on line in 2000, and the forecast of additional capacity next year, Jelinek doesn't expect to see a recovery in fab utilization rates for memory products until 2003. At that time, fabs will be running at about 95% of capacity, he predicted.

In the meantime, buyers should expect to see more of the bargains they've grown accustomed to. Spot prices for some versions of 128Mbit SDRAMs, for example, are still hovering at about $2.

“There is too much capacity,” said Sherry Garber, an analyst at Semico Research Corp., Phoenix. “The demand for 64Mbit is just gone. That's one of the densities where there appears to be a lot of inventory, both at the DRAM vendors and some OEM sites.”

The fab shutdowns disclosed in recent weeks have generally involved older technologies that will be replaced with output from upgraded lines. Citing low demand for its memory products, Toshiba America Electronic Components Inc. last week announced plans to close production in September at its Yokkaichi Operations Fab 1, which includes a 0.20-micron line for DRAMs.

The company, which ranks fifth in DRAM sales, will transfer 300 employees to another line at its Fab 2, where 0.175-micron processes will be used to manufacture 256Mbit DRAM, said Jamie Stitt, director of DRAM products at TAEC, Irvine, Calif. Fab 1 currently makes about 7 million 64Mbit-equivalent DRAMs a month, he said.

“From a financial perspective, we didn't think it was worthwhile to use the 0.2-micron line,” Stitt said. “We have successfully transitioned our customers to the 0.175-micron program, so we'll have no legacy obligations.”

Last month, Hynix Semiconductor Inc.-the industry's No. 3 DRAM maker-closed its fab in Eugene, Ore., for six months and laid off 600 employees due to eroding DRAM prices. During the shutdown, Hynix said it will upgrade the plant from a 0.22-micron process making 64Mbit SDRAM to a new 0.13-micron process able to produce 256Mbit chips.

In July, NEC Corp. said by 2004 it will shift control of its DRAM production at a Hiroshima, Japan, fab to Elpida Memory Inc., a joint venture with Hitachi Ltd. The fab currently acts as a DRAM foundry for Elpida, but NEC executives said they want to abandon all DRAM production within three years.

As with the other temporary cutbacks, NEC's move isn't expected to reduce supply levels significantly because the business will have migrated to Elpida's factories by then, said Jim Sogas, vice president of North American sales at Elpida, Santa Clara, Calif.

“Everybody is expecting or needing to see the supply cut back to line up with demand,” he said. “It's just hard. People don't like to make one-sided cuts in output because they can lose market share.”

Indeed, NEC's decision basically moves production to Elpida, while Toshiba and Hynix are merely shifting to smaller line geometries, Garber said, which eventually will yield even more DRAM per silicon wafer. Representatives for Samsung and Micron-No. 1 and No. 2, respectively, in DRAM sales in 2000-said neither company plans to cut production in the near future.

The top five suppliers--Samsung, Micron, Hynix, NEC, and Toshiba--garnered 80% of the $27 billion DRAM market in 2000, according to Semico. It would take a move by one of these companies to abandon the sector for the industry to see a price impact from the supply side, Garber said, a move that is unlikely to occur.



To: Rich1 who wrote (77272)8/14/2001 12:27:29 AM
From: Don Green  Respond to of 93625
 
Uncertainty clouds PC outlook
By Bolaji Ojo, EBN
Aug 13, 2001 (2:34 PM)
URL: ebnews.com

Is the PC market headed for double-digit growth in the next 18 months, or will sluggish sales continue?

Industry leaders can only agree that a '90s-style PC sales surge is highly unlikely. Beyond that, discord has pitched proponents of a second-half resurgence like Intel Corp.'s Craig Barrett against skeptical analysts at IDC, iSuppli, and Gartner's Dataquest.

While most analysts would not dismiss Barrett's claim of a PC market recovery and reports of higher PC motherboard and notebook shipments from Taiwan, they contend the weak U.S. economy combined with sharp cuts in IT budgets will offset any second-half back-to-school and holiday gains.

Furthermore, the absence of new technology sales drivers, aside from Microsoft Corp.'s Windows XP operating system, will likely keep the PC market in a rut through next year, they said.

“PC sales will remain poor-flat to no growth-unless the value of the PC changes to include compelling [technology] propositions that extend beyond price,” said Charles Smulders, an analyst at the Computing Platform Worldwide group of Dataquest Inc., San Jose. “In addition, much will depend on what happens economically because discretionary spending is always a victim of economic downturns.”

For the first time in 15 years, global PC sales have declined, falling to 30.4 million units in the second quarter from 31 million in the comparable period of 2000. That scenario may be repeated for the entire year.

“Flat [PC] sales this year would be quite an achievement,” said Glyndwr Smith, senior vice president and assistant to the chief executive at Vishay Intertechnology Inc., Malvern, Pa.

To compound the uncertainty, PC OEMs that lack “visibility” into end-market demand are declining to provide sales forecasts for the coming quarters. Many, though, agree that second-half sales will be better than the first half.

“We've seen some stabilization in the U.S., but the market has weakened in Europe and other parts of the world,” said a spokesman for Compaq Computer Corp. “We're not making specific forecasts. It's unpredictable at this point.”

Intel's Barrett based his observation on growing stability in the company's microprocessor business and reports from Taiwan that July PC motherboard and notebook shipments rose 10% from the prior month, according to Steven Fortuna, an analyst at Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc., New York.

But is this enough confirmation that the PC market may be bouncing back? Higher back-to-school and December holiday sales cannot be used to accurately gauge future PC demand, according to analysts. And while Intel's microprocessor sales may have firmed, other PC component suppliers have yet to see similar strength in their operations.

“While the microprocessor is a major chip inside any PC, it's only one chip,” said Shane Rau, an analyst at IDC in Mountain View, Calif. “Other semiconductor companies that make chips for the rest of the PC, such as DRAM suppliers, are not doing well, and we don't think they'll begin to recover until next year.”

That is a widely held view. Merrill Lynch analysts said they remain cautious about the PC market because of slowing sales in Europe and the United States.

“We're not interpreting the July numbers as indicative of improving end-user demand,” Fortuna said. “All of our checks indicate that demand remains weak. It's not easy to tie numbers from Taiwan directly to worldwide unit growth.”

With ASPs declining at a rapid clip and no sales catalyst in sight, PC chip suppliers face several years of dwindling sales, according to IDC.

The research firm estimates 2001 PC chip sales will decline 25%, to $38 billion, from $50.3 billion in 2000, adding that it will take at least four more years before sales recover to the 2000 level.

“The U.S. PC market in units will decline for the first time ever this year. ... Naturally, this decline impacts PC semiconductor suppliers severely,” IDC's Rau said.

Other industry players said continued pricing pressures indicate that PC demand is unlikely to surge over the next few months. Typically, average selling prices start rising early in anticipation of higher component demand, but the contrary has been the case in the DRAM market, according to a spokesman for Micron Technology Inc., Boise, Idaho.

“Demand is still there, but we're dealing with strong price pressures,” he said. “We've seen improvements out of Taiwan but hesitate to say what that means.”

Intel is also planning a big pricing concession to stimulate Pentium 4 processor sales and is expected to chop tags more than 50%, according to a research report from Dan Niles, an analyst at Lehman Brothers Inc., San Francisco.

The anticipated price cuts may light a fire under the market, according to analysts, but the impact will be temporary in North America and Western Europe, where PC penetration has stalled at about 60% of households.

“Some of Intel's optimism is based on their gaining market share from the competition,” Dataquest's Smulders said. “However, Gartner takes a modest view of what's going to happen. In key end markets in Europe and the U.S., we're seeing a saturation of the PC base.”

Rather than focus on the prospects of higher PC sales, component suppliers, especially DRAM manufacturers, are banking on increased memory requirements to boost sales. Microsoft is recommending at least 128Mbytes of DRAM for its newest operating system.

“One of the signs that we're seeing is that the amount of memory per box is increasing significantly, which is a good sign,” the Micron spokesman said. “This is a good indicator, but it's still premature to say a PC market recovery is on the way.”

Despite the gloomy outlook, the PC market has witnessed some positive developments, particularly in the supply chain. Component suppliers said the sector has begun to get its inventory under control, with overall PC component and equipment inventory down to about 10 to 12 weeks from a much higher level at the start of the year.

“We're seeing inventory being moved off and a pull-in of existing orders by OEMs,” Vishay's Smith said. “Component and system price reductions and the new [Pentium 4 and Windows XP] technology will boost the market as we get into the fourth quarter.”