SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mary Cluney who wrote (141451)8/13/2001 1:20:20 PM
From: fingolfen  Respond to of 186894
 
The difference is that Intel CEO has a Phd in engineering from Stanford and Intel has the resources to pursue soi if the calculus came out to that.

From Barrett's Bio: ( intel.com )

"Craig R. Barrett was born on Aug. 29, 1939, in San Francisco, Calif. He attended Stanford University in Palo Alto, California from 1957 to 1964, and received his Bachelor of Science, Master of Science and Ph.D. degrees in Materials Science, also at Stanford. After graduation, he joined the faculty of Stanford University in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and remained through 1974, rising to the rank of Associate Professor. Dr. Barrett was a Fulbright Fellow at Danish Technical University in Denmark in 1972 and a NATO Postdoctoral Fellow at the National Physical Laboratory in England from 1964 to 1965."

Jerry Sanders was an actor wannabee...

So what's changed???



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (141451)8/13/2001 3:13:30 PM
From: AK2004  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Mary
I do not like Jerry myself but as far as performance calculations I doubt very much that either Barrett, Jerry or Gerstner did them personally.
You might doubt the ability of amd even though that amd did very well as far as technology goes. I wonder how would you rate technical expertise of IBM team vs intel?
Regards
-Albert
ps if the superiority of intel is obvious to you then you might want to consider that you might be slightly biased :-))