Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Tracker Corporation America (TRKR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SAM-DAN who wrote (1859)	8/13/2001 4:17:05 PM
From: Mahatmabenfoo	Respond to of 1877

ragingbull.lycos.com

To: SAM-DAN who wrote (1859)	3/31/2002 11:42:16 AM
From: Mahatmabenfoo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1877

SAM DAN SPEAKS! After many posts on RB and SI funneling information he received from TRKR insiders, the mysterious SamDan has gone silent --- but fortunately he shared his tastiest TRKR morsel with me privately, and now I am posting it below. Here's the whisper SamDan is not publicly passing along: TRKR is now whispering that it never even owned the asset system! so even if it existed (dubious) and was worth something (ha!) it's not TRKR's anymore. Do you folks get this? It proves Sammy was merely a conduit through which TRKR pumped its hype, and also proves that for all the hype about TRKR's "technology" it had and has NOTHING. Too bad Sammy is not as vigilant about passing along bad news as he is at passing along pumps. - Charles ======= FROM SAM-DAN to Tilyou === private email=========== Crow doesn't taste very good. Our 'sources' tell us the debenture holders will probably NOT put the company into bankrupcy as there is a 20 million dollar tax loss that would be of value if they kept company alive as a shell and eventually move a revenue generating company into the shell.Probably after a reverse share move.About 192 million shares oustanding[or maybe 92 million-not sure. Contrary to your emphasis on double bar code- the real value of the company is their new asset management technology but our 'sources' say that the people involved in developing this technology did it without payment from TRKR and may have a legitimate right to take the technology with them . Any comments? ========== MY ANSWER ============== Saturday, February 23, 2002 1:06 AM ET To: SAM-DAN (who wrote) From: Charles B. Kramer Well, first, thanks for your very civil response! I don't take pleasure from others misfortune... but, yeah, I suppose there's a certain pleasure in being right about TRKR. --'sources' tell us the debenture holders will probably NOT --put the company into bankrupcy as there is a 20 million --dollar tax loss that would be of value if they kept --company alive as a shell and eventually move a revenue --generating company into the shell. I have no opinion about all that. I am amazed at the many many millions (isn't it more than $20M overall?) that TRKR has burned through, with very little to show for it. --Contrary to your emphasis on double bar code- the real --value of the company is their new asset management --technology but our 'sources' say that the people involved --in developing this technology did it without payment from --TRKR and may have a legitimate right to take the --technology with them . --Any comments? I am very skeptical that TRKR ever had any technology that was worth anything -- there are just too many 2d Bar code companies out there with real applications targeted for particular industries. TRKR doens't have the experience or personnel to develop anything, and its boasts about what it was developing were so big the more likely truth is it has zero. And nobody develops technology for nothing -- I mean, they could have done the work purely for themselves. Maybe parttime devlopers would work for shares. For TRKR to claim to own technology it could lose is a major scandal -- something that should have been reported in TRKR SEC statements. My guess? It's just a way for TRKR to cover up the fact that they have nothing. "Oh, we 'HAD' something", your source seem to be telling you, "but the developers got to take it away'". Ha! In any event, thanks for writing and good luck in your investments. - Charles