To: Ilaine who wrote (7078 ) 8/14/2001 5:46:00 AM From: Maurice Winn Respond to of 74559 <Should all roads, highways and bridges be privatized? > Since the government already owns them, they might as well continue owning them. <Do we pay tolls to each homeowner when we pass in front of their house, or what? > No, tolls would be paid to the owner. In the above case, the government owning the roads. <If the swamps get full of mosquitos, and everyone is coming down with malaria, but the rich guy who owns the land around the swamp doesn't want to kill the larvae, and all the people who are getting sick and dying are poor, is there a free market solution? > Yes, you sue the person for damages under normal laws. It's illegal in a free market to attack or create attacking beasties, or other dangers such as landslides onto neighbours. People aren't allowed to create a public nuisance or damage in free markets. If there were always mosquitoes coming from the swamp, then the owner has existing use rights and newly-arriving neighbours couldn't reasonably moan. <What if GE decides to dump PCBs into the Hudson River? What's the free market solution? > Gaol the people from the company who did it. Sue the company for the cost of the damage plus a whole lot more as a punishment. <The Mississippi River floods in the spring. What's the free market solution? > Somebody buys the land, builds a long dam, sells the now safe land for a huge profit. Those are not difficult puzzles! There are more tricky ones in the nature of probablistic risk. You can get some ideas here:libertarianz.org.nz Governments cause financial panics by forcing monopolies on the public, by reacting stupidly when things happen [California and New Zealand need energy at higher prices] and all sorts of means, such as war. Left to free markets, speculators would smooth fluctuations. People would be so rich that small glitches wouldn't matter anyway. There would not even be discussion of a financial collapse in 2001. Which there won't be. Mqurice