Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (5934)	8/15/2001 12:57:29 PM
From: Patricia Trinchero	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

Scaife was a large contributor to the campaign of Richard Nixon. He won huge government contracts from the Nixon administration during the Vietnam era and made billions of dollars making bombs for the Vietnam War. His party was ended when Nixon was removed from office. Hillary Clinton was one of the principal attorneys who worked for the Democrats in their attempt to find a legal way to nail Nixon. It's no wonder Scaife has hated the Clinton's and threw so much money toward organizations and people who were opposed to the Clinton's. Hillary was partly responsible for the ending of Sacife's party at the government trough.

To: TigerPaw who wrote (5934)	8/22/2001 4:06:24 PM
From: Mephisto	Respond to of 93284

"People who knew Bush when he was at Yale said he was a loner. He could never fit in. " They mentioned the drinking and the partying as well, but everyone knows about that. Yep! It's insane. Bush is doing just what NYTimes's Op-Ed Editor Krugman said Bush would do: Raid Social Security and I imagine Medicare as well to support tax cut

To: TigerPaw who wrote (5934)	8/22/2001 4:10:14 PM
From: Mephisto	Respond to of 93284

Rip Van Rummy Awakes August 22, 2001 From The New York Times By MAUREEN DOWD WASHINGTON -- When Rip Van Rummy came down from the mountain after 25 years, gray and lined, the village was much changed. Strange faces everywhere and a bustling, disputatious tone about it, bilious folk haranguing about politics. The very character of the people seemed different. Poor Rummy. First he goes to Moscow and tries to explain to Vladimir Putin why the U.S. wants to shred all its treaties and put up Star Wars Saran Wrap, and the Russians wonder if he's slept through the last decade of jabbering about globalization. At home, Henry Kissinger and his acolytes whisper that they're worried that Rummy is too far out there, in a headlong rush straight backward that's driving Russia and China together. (You know you're in trouble when Dr. Strangelove thinks you're Dr. Strangelove.) Back at the Pentagon, Rummy discovers that the military brass -- as irritated by the defense secretary's high-handed ways as the rest of the world -- has staged a coup. In an e-mail version of "Seven Days in May," the Joint Chiefs have mobilized allies on the Hill and sabotaged the secretary's plan to modernize and trim the services and use the money saved for the missile shield. The chimerical shield is being pushed by a corps of Reaganite true believers in the administration, a cadre of Richard Perle types (including Richard Perle, back at the Pentagon) for whom this is not a policy but a theology. The Bushies gave Russia a deadline yesterday of November to make a deal on changing (read abandoning) the ABM treaty, because the missile missionaries want to start clearing ground and cutting down trees this week in Alaska for silos and a command center. They probably need to hurry up and get there before the oil drillers. Instead of Rummy doing a hostile takeover on the military, the military took over the hostile Rummy. They plotted in the Tank, their secure conference room in the Pentagon, and outfoxholed him. Now he's saying the services can decide how to move into the future themselves. In a startling interview with Michael Duffy in Time, the 69-year-old with the reputation as a master infighter admitted he had been outmaneuvered because he didn't understand how much Washington had changed since 1976. The military is politicized and no longer subservient. The press is no longer quiescent. Congress is no longer run by a few smart old Southern guys. Secrets no longer exist. This raises the urgent question of just how conscious of the world around him Rip Van Rummy is. What sentient CNN-watching creature on the planet does not know about these changes? He tells Mr. Duffy that when he moved back in January, "I was not into the rhythm of the place." "My Lord, in this place, all you have to do is think about something, and it is leaked," he says. "It's like there are eavesdropping microphones on your brain." He ran three different companies over a quarter of a century, but he doesn't seem to know about America's merger mania. About defense contractors, he sounded surprised that "They have gone from a lot to a few, and they have activities in a very large number of Congressional districts." He's even more clueless about the press. "It's arranged for promoting conflict, difficulty and problems," he says. And this is a news flash to him? The traditional coziness between a Republican administration and the military is shattered. The White House is angry at Rummy for knuckling under and at the military for wanting more money and no reform. And the military, which had Bill Clinton, who was terrified of crossing it, nicely tucked in its pocket by the end of his second term, now wonders if it would have fared better with Al Gore. Well, I guess we can close the book on W.'s contention that the best way to run government is with the wisdom of corporate chieftains. He got a trio of C.E.O.'s in there -- Rummy, Dick Cheney and Paul O'Neill -- and the most striking thing is how out of touch they act. Perhaps because they have been in the rarefied atmosphere of corporate suites so long, these guys seem constantly taken aback that when you state your position in Washington, it isn't the end of an argument, but the beginning. How can the people who were supposed to know how the world works not know anything about how the world works? nytimes.com