Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (23896)	8/13/2001 11:00:35 PM
From: Rich1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30051

Thats okay cause I dont know a Mooter from a Tlink...LOL..

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (23896)	8/13/2001 11:58:47 PM
From: Mark Johnson	Respond to of 30051

<<<I think that I erred, I meant to say "Mooter" deserted ship,>> more mis-information....

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (23896)	8/14/2001 12:34:34 AM
From: LTK007	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 30051

Zeev,Security Trader site,a solid TA only site,removed RMBS today from stocks it covers,declaring it is "a dead stock". This is a TA call,nothing more. Do you agree??? max

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (23896)	8/14/2001 7:09:08 AM
From: Grashopper	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30051

IS VANCE ON TARGET WITH HIS submitted info on WFR because you stated that it COULD LIKELY go bankrupt but if you were wrong it was a great buy at these prices????????? I MAY BE WRONG BUT HIS POST appears to indicate that bankruptcy will not happen.......if he is correct then WFR is a bargain.........i quess what i am asking is whether his submission gave you new info that either tilted your view either oneway towards a great buy or the other way that you still remain fearful that WFR may go bankrupt? TIA PS IF I KNEW IN ADVANCE THAT GRANDCHILDREN WERE SO MUCH FUN AND JOY,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,I WOULDNT HAVE WAITED SO LONG TO HAVE THEM