SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (21710)8/14/2001 10:06:50 AM
From: Poet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
TS definitely has a place in our poly-marriage, particularly after last night, when Chris dragged out his tiresome anti-feminism argument.



To: Lane3 who wrote (21710)8/14/2001 10:34:57 AM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
Two-Parent Families Rise After Changes in Welfare

nytimes.com

It also talks about some dificulties with welfare reform but I'm surprised to see this article in the times that leans to being positive on welfare reform.

Of course with polygamy reform that you are talking about maybe we can see a rise in 6 parent households...

Tim



To: Lane3 who wrote (21710)8/14/2001 12:02:27 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
Hey, wait a minute. You're inviting TS to join our group without consulting the others? I mean, he's one of those uncouth male types. We only want couth, civilized males like myself and Bill.



To: Lane3 who wrote (21710)8/14/2001 12:04:19 PM
From: thames_sider  Respond to of 82486
 
Oh, there'd be far more spice if it were to stay illegal.

I'm the tidy type, BTW. Except for books, which live on all available surfaces simply from necessity.
OTOH I've never been married so the culture clash could be too vast. I shan't say for which side. [And I suspect Sherry would now be wary, too...]. LOL, if there's an existing veto I doubt I'd get in anyhow.