SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (171189)8/14/2001 10:49:20 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769669
 
The confidence is a function of probability. So far, the data is suggestive, but no more.....



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (171189)8/14/2001 10:53:49 AM
From: DMaA  Respond to of 769669
 
As has been pointed out many times, the small subset of O2/Global warming theory that scientists agree on has no policy implications.

I certainly would not call the opinion of the National Academy of Sciences a low degree of confidence on this issue.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (171189)8/14/2001 10:56:52 AM
From: CYBERKEN  Respond to of 769669
 
That's why the first legitimate study of global warming needs to be made. The pseudo-scientists with political agendas have snowed the usual suspects among the liberal sheep, and the sinister left wing leaders of the movement have taken full advantage of it to trash the developed countries using this junk science fraud.

PhD's, Nobel Prizes, and similar credentials have today replaced the snake oil salesman's checkered jacket and shiny shoes to support frauds like global warming and acid rain. Is it any wonder that the perpetrators of the Social Security Ponzi scheme have so little trouble convincing a large segment of the ignorant public that there are "trust funds" and that government can "pay" for the pyramid by simply retiring dollars from circulation?

The liberals on this thread are just some of the sheep. They are getting sheared on a regular basis, and their left wing media convinces them that that's the way the world should turn...



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (171189)8/14/2001 11:34:21 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769669
 
the opinion of the National Academy of Sciences is. What is it? Where is it? Is it. The opinion of the National Academy of Sciences is that a low degree of confidence that any correlation exists between C02 and Global Warming.

We are speaking of the US National Academy of Sciences and not the Cuban? www4.nas.edu

tom watson tosiwmee