SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stephen wall who wrote (3680)8/14/2001 3:47:41 PM
From: TheStockFairy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 46821
 
Well, the way that I look at it is this: A long haul circuit terminated at a long haul POP is of no use to a corporate customer or a carrier. Each and every one of the energy companies will have to have a metro strategy, in one way, shape or form.

Each of the existing energy companies has their own strategy in place or in development, whether it's partnerships with metro carriers, owning a carrier hotel, building a pooling point (probably the most struggling solution), purchasing metro circuits and having them sit there and waiting for demand or buying dark fiber and lighting it.

All of the tele-energy companies are butting heads currently butting heads with long haul carriers in some way or another. They have bought, leased or negotiated contracts for long haul capacity for one or more of four reasons: 1) To increase liquidity at a certain location or pooling point 2) To practice predatory pricing to force carriers to participate in trading (not admitted, but that's what happened) 3) To sell general network services to IXCs, CLECs, enterprise customers 4) To increase overall liquidity in the trading marketplace

Falling back to my last post, from what I have seen, there are some great traders out there, not so many great general salespeople. If anyone knows something different about the state of their salespeople, please let me know!