Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JD_Canuck who wrote (77442)	8/15/2001 1:05:26 AM
From: Bilow	Respond to of 93625

Hi JD_Canuck; I'm so glad you're still with the party! LOL!!! BWAHAHAHAHA!!! -- Carl

To: JD_Canuck who wrote (77442)	8/15/2001 1:19:36 AM
From: JD_Canuck	Respond to of 93625

Ahhhh, here we go...by using twice as much even more expensive DDR than RDRAM, we get the Via board to perform a tad better, and at 1.7 Ghz too, i knew we could do a bit better. We will ignore the tests that show the RDRAM off and instead focus on the ones that show the DDR system in the best lite. And we will be very quiet on the actual price difference between this DDR and RDRAM and pretend its far cheaper. Shhhhhhh....