SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ColtonGang who wrote (171493)8/15/2001 9:18:34 AM
From: alan w  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Wrong again.

Until born, a fetus is solely dependent on the mother.

I don't know about the babies in your state, but the ones here do not become independent for several years. Maybe the abortion supporters in our area could lobby our legislature to make abortions legal until the age of 3 or 4 years to take this particular feature of our infants into account.

Only once the fetus is born, are rights given to that newborn.

I guess I missed the appearance of the official giver of rights when my kids were born. I was there during both deliveries but I did run to the restroom after their births. Maybe he/she came during this time. So I'm not saying this part of your explanation is false.

alan w



To: ColtonGang who wrote (171493)8/15/2001 11:59:26 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Using your rationale the mother can instruct a doctor to stick a needle into the skull of a fetus as it presents itself during birth. Actually you could wack it's head off after only the head is exposed during birth.

You are such a civilized thinker.

tom watson tosiwmee


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News