SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: fyodor_ who wrote (51241)8/15/2001 2:57:31 PM
From: wanna_bmwRespond to of 275872
 
Fyodor, Re: "Of course you accidentally forgot that VIA doesn't pay any licensing fee for the P4X266."

If you caught the original conversation, I was speaking hypothetically about Intel offering VIA a license, and then VIA declining it. Peter_luc quoted Anand as claiming insider information concerning a $10-$20 license fee imposed by Intel. I argued that such a fee sounded ridiculous, given that it would be almost approaching VIA's original cost goals. Even if this caused VIA to raise their price to the same $40 level as the i845, Intel could never get away with imposing a 50% licensing fee, and that was my point. The bus cluster license may be worth, what? about 5-10% of the chipset? I can't imagine Intel imposing more than $2-3 on licensing fees, and even that would be Rambus-style high.

wanna_bmw