Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pink Minion who wrote (50660)	8/16/2001 10:43:18 AM
From: daryll40	Respond to of 70976

Ex, this will be my last post on this subject since I don't want to start a whole new thread. I agree with everything that you posted and think that the bubble would have deflated sooner or later. My point was that if you accept that as the premise, then you cannot blame Greenspan ANY MORE than you can blame the Clinton Justice Dept. You can make the case that EITHER (or other stuff) caused the bursting bubble but in reality it would have burst sooner or later anyway.

To: Pink Minion who wrote (50660)	8/16/2001 10:48:06 AM
From: Jerome	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 70976

>>>But the actual "ACT" that started this Naz slide was the Clinton Justice Dept action <<< The logic of the matter is simply this......Daryll40 has a severe case of "Clinton Bashing Disease", This is not to be confused with, Rush Limbaugh Admiration Disease"...the symptoms are quite similar.... but the differential diagnosis is a little difficult. Cash contributions to either cause is usually considered the definitive diagnostic tool. Regards, Jerome