Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_K who wrote (10243)	8/17/2001 9:12:31 AM
From: AllansAlias	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

He did pretty well I think, but perhaps JRI can comment. I expect he follows them more closely than I.

To: J_K who wrote (10243)	8/17/2001 9:17:55 AM
From: JRI	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

Spotty, I think Juergen....as he admits in today's, he was looking for more up a few days ago, and it just didn't happen....I think Onishcka didn't even have heavy down for his alternate. Having said this, he does admit fault, and (usually) he'll abandon a losing count pretty quick when wrong.... Its not criminal to be wrong, only to stay wrong. ng,g

To: J_K who wrote (10243)	8/17/2001 11:03:58 AM
From: Henry J Costanzo	Respond to of 209892

Juergen.......In your absence, took it upon myself to try to fill in the thread on Onischka's updates...though I've been stymied lately by not being able to get the translations ( still keep getting Babelfish error messages) and only being able to look at the charts. I'd say On. has not been very correct in his calls lately - he was generally looking for more upside, and even in his alternative counts, did not foresee extent of the pullback... But he seems to be back on track today, with his preferred count pulling back to 1515... Glad you're back, and can keep the thread better informed on On. than I could.......