SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: AK2004 who wrote (51615)8/17/2001 9:43:25 PM
From: YousefRespond to of 275872
 
Albert,

Re: " ... either it is good idea or not it is up to manufacturers to
decide that. The only thing that intel can do is to inform them."

And that is exactly what INTC has done ... They have informed the
mobo manufacturers. Please don't "cry" too much in your "coffee". <ggg>

Make It So,
Yousef



To: AK2004 who wrote (51615)8/18/2001 2:14:18 AM
From: wanna_bmwRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Albert, Re: "re: Wouldn't you consider it a good idea for these manufacturers to halt production until the licensing can be cleared up in court?
either it is good idea or not it is up to manufacturers to decide that. The only thing that intel can do is to inform them."

Intel is informing them, only you think that they are also threatening them.

As for your other counter-analogy, that would only apply to what I was saying if I went to the store, bought high volumes of Pentium 4 CPUs, and then planned to sell them all in Pentium 4 systems. And, AMD would have to publicly announce the patents that Intel is infringing on, so that I would be able to take them seriously. And of course, if I still thought AMD was full of hot air, I could still buy the systems under the assumption that they'd lose in court to Intel. If I'm wrong, and AMD wins this theoretical court case, then I may be liable for any Pentium 4 systems that I allowed to be shipped to the public.

wanna_bmw