Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: westpacific who wrote (24649)	8/18/2001 8:15:18 PM
From: TREND1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30051

West How about just one "before the fact" real time example of your system of one stock ? Larry Dudash

To: westpacific who wrote (24649)	8/18/2001 10:50:21 PM
From: stockmarket14	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30051

I think some of you have been too hard on West. If you lurk on any message boards, you should have the basic understanding that it is your own responsibility not the posters, if you act upon the posters' statement. I personally believe that West is in good heart to share his information and judgement just like Zeev. Don't blame on West or Zeev, if their judgements don't come true. It is the risk you must take or don't lurk on message boards. Of course, I could be wrong, but I would like to give West the benefit of doubt. West, I enjoy your post and your big warning last Fri about next week.

To: westpacific who wrote (24649)	8/18/2001 11:56:53 PM
From: Math Junkie	Respond to of 30051

Sorry if I seemed overly critical - you said you were thinking about not posting any more, and I was just trying to suggest some less drastic alternatives. I am at a loss to understand what I said that could be construed as a threat. You were the one who brought up lawsuits. I thought I plainly indicated that I have no interest in lawsuits, but if not, I'm saying it now. Furthermore, if there are people who are actually suing Internet posters over opinions expressed on a message board, I think such suits should be summarily rejected, with all costs paid by the plaintiff. So I think that should make perfectly clear how I feel about that kind of nonsense. You have now, finally, answered my question about the time period to which your one hundred percent accuracy statement applies, i.e., the past two years. Now there is at least a chance for readers to make their own informed decisions about what weight to give your forecasts.