Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (141965)	8/19/2001 5:30:21 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Wrong again, Dan. this notched poly technique is still used in all of Intel's processes How do you know Intel is still using the notched gate process?? THE WATSONYOUTH

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (141965)	8/19/2001 7:15:14 PM
From: Dan3	Respond to of 186894

Re: FUD that people here can't dispute? Dispute all you want, Intel lost a big chunk of market share when its move to notched gates blew up in its face, and, so far, hasn't been able to gain that market share back.

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (141965)	8/19/2001 7:25:04 PM
From: Dan3	Respond to of 186894

Re: you close your mind to everything that Intel says Yeah, I'm still kicking myself for not picking up a Rambus system with a PIII last year. Intel swore that combination of processor and memory would be a performance champion. Intel also said that copper was irrelevant at .18, but AMD has (according to you guys) gotten as much an advantage from copper at .18 with 248nm lithography as they'll be able to get from 193nm lithography and SOI at .13 on copper. Which would rather conclusively, according to your view of reality, be another case of Intel spreading completely false information.