SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (23207)8/19/2001 9:18:22 PM
From: Win Smith  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
Meanwhile, a couple compare and contrast articles in the Sunday paper in your area, Karen.

Norton Charts a Different Course for the Interior Department nytimes.com

Ms. Norton's most consistent theme so far is that the concerns of Western communities have been ignored by the federal government. She often evokes an image of clueless Easterners who cannot fathom that the combined size of the new national monuments created by President Clinton, for example, is bigger than the state of Connecticut.

"The federal government controls half the land in the West," Ms. Norton said. "We have a tremendous impact on people's lives."


"Clueless Easterners", as opposed to disingenuous Western Watt disciples? Anybody who's ever looked at a map would smell a rather stinky red herring in the Connecticut thing, but to make it explicit, earlier in the article we have:

The secretary is the emperor of the outdoors, in charge of 436 million acres of public land,. . .

In case anyone was wondering, the area of Connecticut is 3.1 million acres.

Elsewhere in the Times, an article about a more mainstream environmental type in the Bush administration. That is, general population mainstream, not Bush administration mainstream. Whitman doesn't see her tenure as particularly secure, as you might guess.

Christie Todd Whitman May Have the Most Thankless Job in Washington nytimes.com

Will Whitman become isolated as the moderate, abortion-rights representative in a mainly conservative administration? She bristles at this question, pointing out that fellow cabinet officers like Gale Norton, secretary of the interior, and Ann Veneman, secretary of agriculture -- Whitman has lunch with them monthly -- are also in favor of abortion rights, ''and you never hear anything about that.'' She has learned from her experience with Kyoto, however, to listen more closely to the White House's script. After initially playing down the idea of conservation, the administration, especially the vice president, has recently been emphasizing it. So Whitman has adjusted her schedule to spend more time talking about E.P.A.'s Energy Star program, which endorses products that reduce energy use. She has not campaigned for greenhouse rules in public, a la John McCain and Joseph Lieberman, so as not to open a split with the president. Some part of her may sense inevitable confrontation, however. Asked how long she expects to stay at E.P.A., Whitman says that the president has her resignation letter in his desk. Reminded that it is tradition for cabinet officers to file an undated resignation letter, she explains, ''What I mean is, I've told him that if I have to go he shouldn't think I would make it awkward.''

For some reason deeply seated in the party's psyche -- maybe that it simply cannot bring itself to admit that regulations are sometimes good for us -- Republicans keep failing to come to terms with environmental sentiment. Environmentalism is to Republicans what defense is to Democrats: the issue they just don't know how to deal with and really, really wish would go away. Bush is only the latest Republican leader to stumble on the environment, and Christie Whitman is trying to change that. But she may well end up tossed out of the plane just to see where she lands.