SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: wanna_bmw who wrote (51703)8/19/2001 11:22:29 PM
From: Dan3Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Re: That may be a flaw in your logic

What are you talking about?

I pointed out, and without speculating as to what that reason might be, that retailers were promoting neither AMD's nor Intel's faster models.

You decided it was because they weren't satisfied with the cooling solution - but mentioned only AMD. I disagreed with your conclusion and pointed out that if it applied to AMD it also applied to Intel - in fact there was more avoidance of high speed Intel models than high speed AMD models.

There are now 10's of millions of field tested AMD processors that have high current draw - OEMs and even screwdriver shops know how to accommodate the K7 core. They have no equivalent experience to give them confidence when dealing with P4.

The fastest P4s actually draw a little more power under load, and are a little less tolerant of high temperature than K7, making them a bit more of a challenge to cool. If retailers are shy about the K7 core systems, they must be out and out nervous about the P4 systems - which would explain their avoidance of the top 4 P4 speeds while they only avoid the top 2 AMD speeds.

Except that I don't think that it's an issue for either processor. The OEM machines on retailers shelves today were speced from available chips nearly 2 months ago, and what we're seeing are the fastest, widely available, chips from that time.



To: wanna_bmw who wrote (51703)8/20/2001 6:52:42 PM
From: fyodor_Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Wanna: If you'll recall, Intel spent a lot of effort in perfecting the cooling solution for the Pentium 4 to last well into the 2GHz range.

Just what kind of tobacco are you smoking?

Well into the 2GHz range? Sure as hell not on the current process, so your argument goes right out the window. In fact, I think I see it flopping around on the sidewalk down there, begging passers-by to kill it completely.

-fyo