Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Deeber who wrote (8156)	8/20/2001 11:32:16 AM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	Respond to of 19428

Maurice's claim to fame/infamy: Subject 34482 Be sure to read the earlier revisions of the introductory post.

To: Deeber who wrote (8156)	8/20/2001 6:40:53 PM
From: Snowshoe	Respond to of 19428

>>Who the hell are you anyway?<< Message 13699771 " To:Maurice Winn who wrote (148) From: Deeber Friday, May 12, 2000 9:35 AM View Replies (2) \| Respond to of 502 Maurice, are you really this stupid?? First of all, the short squeeze by calling for shares has been tried to no avain, only a moron would do that as even if a stock does go up, you cant sell unless you send them the shares, most brokers need shares iN THE ACCOUNT to sell them. Samrt...so you organize this thing so everyone calls for shares...EXCEPT YOU...and stock happens to go up, and the only one that can sell is you. You are a true moron and scum for setting this up, and i hope the SEC sticks you with Tokyo Mexx in prison. "

To: Deeber who wrote (8156)	8/26/2001 7:10:29 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Respond to of 19428

Dweeber, just to remind you [Snowshoe pointed out one of your posts] I am old enough and wise enough to know that people like you have a hard life to live [due to your own mindless actions]. I also know that you became like that from a bad life. You should not be surprised that you don't get sympathy for selling somebody else's property. I hope you end in prison, hammered by thugs. I doubt you have children [what a shame for them if you have] but I wouldn't wish any of them to die because I don't think they should be considered responsible for your crimes. I expect any woman who mistakenly had children with you has long since ditched you. Sensibly. Violent people like you are not good husbands. Being one of those sorts of people, you didn't apologize for an ill-conceived and vicious comment. Now you compound it with more, which didn't surprise me. Maybe if you try a different attitude to other people, you'll be happier. Try it! They will not always seem to be putting you down and making your life difficult if you take a decent approach with them. Why would you think I would be supportive of you? For the record: To:DWB who wrote (153) From: Deeber Friday, May 12, 2000 9:55 AM View Replies (2) \| Respond to of 504 DWB: Not at all, I just read that article in the WSJ and thought it was pathetic. Anyone open enough to admit what their intentions are deserves to be in prison being hammered by thugs. I have been involved back in the day with this same thing, IT DOES NOT WORK, and it only hurts the longs who fall for the scheme and call for shares. He is a selfish moron for doing this, and I hope the company sues him too.