SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (172813)8/20/2001 2:15:26 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
SDI is part of a movement to rely less upon our strategic arsenal, to build it down, and to avoid the hard necessity of having to hit back with weapons of mass destruction if there is an attack on us. The whole idea was to retreat from the doctrine of MAD, which saves resources in the long run, as well as being more satisfactory morally. Additionally, we cannot be confident enough about rogue regimes, like North Korea, to depend solely on retaliation. Their behavior is often erratic, and, additionally, if we were to substantially reduce our nuclear arsenals, they might mistakenly take that as a sign of weakness. Finally, it is true that there are all sorts of risks that cannot be covered by SDI. However, SDI, by allowing us to revise our current defense posture, will ultimately free resources to better deal with the assortment of threats........