SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E who wrote (23400)8/20/2001 3:52:03 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Thanks for answering that post.

Now will you also, please, answer the posts in which I gave you links which I think justify, if they don't prove, the points brees was making?

I really don't want to have to belabor this endlessly, but you seem for some reason to be avoiding a straight answer to such questions as:

Could as statement that you support the death penalty as long as no more than 30% of the people killed are innocent be reasonably construed as--by now I've forgotten brees's exact words, but as a lack of concern for justice?

Could a statement that you're in favor of torture and of cannibalism and headhunting be reasonably construed as a lack or concern for human values?

these questions, I think, should be fairly easy for an active member of AI to answer.

Please do.



To: E who wrote (23400)8/20/2001 3:57:17 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 82486
 
LOL!! Pomposity factor is off the charts on that one!

I am attracted to displays of pigheadedness, like some who "rubberneck" at traffic accidents. Your continuing insistence that brees lied and that there is no other interpretation but the one you assign to his post is quite "revealing" as you indictated. And, I find it fascinating in a mental health sort of way....

JLA