Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marginnayan who wrote (103075)	8/21/2001 1:08:41 AM
From: Jon Koplik	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Interesting footnote re: currency risk / companies hedging their currency exposure / etc. When I was in my last term at business school (spring 1980) (the tail end of a period of nearly continuous U.S. Dollar down / every other currency in the world ... up) ... I took a course titled something like : Advanced Topics in International Finance Theory. The professor was a real iconoclast. *********************** (Pause for definition of iconoclast) (from dictionary.com ) : 1.One who attacks and seeks to overthrow traditional or popular ideas or institutions. 2.One who destroys sacred religious images. Word History : An iconoclast can be unpleasant company, but at least the modern iconoclast only attacks such things as ideas and institutions. The original iconoclasts destroyed countless works of art. Eikonoklasts, the ancestor of our word, was first formed in Medieval Greek from the elements eikn, “image, likeness,” and -klast s, “breaker,” from kln, “to break.” The images referred to by the word are religious images, which were the subject of controversy among Christians of the Byzantine Empire in the 8th and 9th centuries, when iconoclasm was at its height. In addition to destroying many sculptures and paintings, those opposed to images attempted to have them barred from display and veneration. During the Protestant Reformation images in churches were again felt to be idolatrous and were once more banned and destroyed. It is around this time that iconoclast, the descendant of the Greek word, is first recorded in English (1641), with reference to the Byzantine iconoclasts. In the 19th century iconoclast took on the secular sense that it has today, as in “Kant was the great iconoclast” ***************************** One of the anecdotes our professor told us was : Almost all companies (at that time) were diligently hedging away currency exposure (from : the balance sheet value of foreign manufacturing plants, (forward-dated) purchases of materials from overseas suppliers, and (forward-dated) sales of finished products to overseas customers). Simultaneous with this -- more or less ALL company pension fund managers were going "ga-ga" regarding foreign investing. The (U.S. Dollar) returns from owning foreign stocks had been fantastic; and the concept of "prudent man" (as it relates to managing pension assets) suggested that ignoring non-U.S. stock markets was not a good idea. Mathematical, analytical economists looked at all of this, and noticed : The excess return from owning foreign stocks was currency based, not anything else. The magnitude of most corporations' "ideal" overseas stock allocation for their pension assets just happened to be pretty much exactly equal to the magnitude of all of the currency hedging that the "real business of the company" was conducting. Thus, in a rational world -- companies should have stopped ALL currency hedging, AND ... ALL overseas investing of pension assets. But, of course, this never happened ... Jon.

To: marginnayan who wrote (103075)	8/21/2001 9:29:11 AM
From: Jim Willie CB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

US-based multinationals sometimes hedge vs US$ but it is not easy to do well Proctor & Gambler tried a few years ago, but failed badly they took a $200m writeoff the challenge is to completely avoid temptation to stray hedging is not so difficult but staying clear of a little extra (gamble) is tough a little intelligence in this regard is dangerous zero insight leads to simple hedging some shmartz leads to small/medium currency gambles a shifting dollar doesnt matter to about 15-20% of multinationals imho it matters a lot to the rest most dont know how to do it, so they dont do it later they wish they knew how eventually some try and a few get snared by temptation to gamble it can be like walking on a knife's edge / jim