SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (51883)8/21/2001 1:04:53 PM
From: fyodor_Respond to of 275872
 
Dan: Well, it had the lowest Tmax, so you must be correct according to wanna_bmw's logic.

Oh give it a rest! Wanna is not Paul. In fact, Wanna hasn't even commented on the Tj(max) issue, as far as I can tell. (He did comment on the general heat dissipation issue that preceded the Tj(max) debate).

Maybe you were thinking of Yousef?

-fyo



To: Dan3 who wrote (51883)8/21/2001 1:05:27 PM
From: Ali ChenRespond to of 275872
 
Dan3, "So I guess the 1.13GHz PIII was the most reliable of all? LOL!!!
Well, it had the lowest Tmax, so you must be correct according to wanna_bmw's logic."

According to Yousef's logic, it is too. It may not
run code very well, but it can probably outlast
everything :) :)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News