test.crbindex.com@ECC.1 ... just posting this here so it's handy ... definite trend there, eh
Not just the Fed cutting this week - #reply-16240398
qbx.v - still i don't really understand the deal with uph.v, had the rough outline grasped but then lost it ... but the basic principles i'm going on are these - 1. the value is certainly there, qbx trading cheap compared to holdings, and more importantly - 2. up.to was Hislop's baby through the last pump it had, the one where it got a little ... um, discredited ... there appears to be much more of substance to it now, and i think one of the primary motivations of H is to salvage his name to some extent by making the company work out, and get taken out ... and better yet, get taken out through the machinations of his prime vehicle qbx.v, to his greater glory and profit ... but when, that's the thing ... could be quite a while yet, or not, who knows .... one thing i've lost track of is - How much cash will qbx have after the uph.v takeover is completed? ... if not much, then there may not be any more little deals to excite the market, it'll just be a leveraged way to play up.to
'TSX-LK-CMI ' ... lk, what's that, do you mean ldm.to? - if so, then yes, and they could take out our garbage really really fast using highspeed satellite download, as well ...... i lightened up on the cmi, partly it wasn't moving like i'd expected, partly concern over general market, but mostly because i wasn't going to get time to look into it ... also, still very conscious of getting hung with that axi.b paper ..... i do like the cmi story, but then i liked Axxent too, duh
lor.to - stockcharts.com - looks like it's making a double bottom now? ... although it could make another at thirty cents, life has no guarantees ... but i doubt it ... this one i've watched off and on for years, and it's doing now what it's always done, which is fall back on low volume ... when the volume comes in, it goes north .... but i don't know any of the story lately, really should brush up on it, this thing always treated me well, don't know how it fell off the shortlist ... [well it got bought up way high last year, that's how]
eld.to - don't really know it ... as of three or four years ago i used to think of it in a package with tvx.to and gre.to, similar debt and problems and maybe not the best of management, or the best of luck, or something ... and bgo.to too, and others ... they all sort of fell off the screen .... things change though, i see russ a while ago saying they've made some good moves lately, and this is not a bad-looking chart - stockcharts.com
nt.to - our 'national stock' of yesteryear ... really what we need for a national stock now, with these Bushistan moves against our lumber, is a major condom producer .... in the next bull market for tech there will be a whole new set of high-flyers, imho that's just the way things go ... with resources the factors are always the same - the cycles of the market and the effects of the moves companies make to deal with them ... but in tech, it's like somebody invents a metal that makes yours obsolete overnight, and you've got nothing ... now good management can deal with that in any business, and thrive, but still the buy and hold approach on something with three billions out!! is too scarey for me |
