Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (24013)	8/22/2001 3:31:37 PM
From: The Philosopher	Respond to of 82486

Oh. Thanks for the translation.

To: jlallen who wrote (24013)	8/22/2001 3:44:48 PM
From: E	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 82486

I didn't interpret it, I read it. Nothing to interpret-- unless of course one wants to help the one who posted a false attribution wiggle out of what his post plainly says. Then the interpretation starts!!! It depends on what 'is' is, right, JLA? Well, interpret away, interpret interpret interpret until the cows come home, Mr. miniClinton! Those of us who can read know what 'is' is without Clinton 'interpreting' it for us, and what 'mentioning' a 'distaste for' certain noble nouns is, too, and what it isn't, without a bunch of miniClinton's interpreting for us to try to prove 'is' is "well maybe it could mean right now, i'm not having sex right now, and anyway 'having sex' doesn't mean oral sex, i extrapolated that it meant penetration, i concluded it, it was my fair characterization of what sex with that woman meant...." Buncha miniClintons over here, interpreting interpreting interpreting perfectly plain words. I have interpreted nothing.