Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Perspective who wrote (10887)	8/23/2001 4:02:39 PM
From: AllansAlias	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 209892

Good post BC. I think there is much to be learned from Elliott Wave other than trying to fit the market to a count.

To: Perspective who wrote (10887)	8/23/2001 4:03:09 PM
From: JRI	Respond to of 209892

That was a great, great post BC...one of the best I've read since thread started...great job

To: Perspective who wrote (10887)	8/23/2001 4:44:11 PM
From: ru2	Respond to of 209892

Great post! Ru

To: Perspective who wrote (10887)	8/23/2001 5:42:35 PM
From: The Freep	Respond to of 209892

Good post, Bobcor. It's remarkable to me to watch the markets keep threatening to totally breakdown. . . then threatening to break up. . .then lather rinse repeat. The VIX implies we ain't seen nothing yet. . . but it's been implying that for a long time. The Naz has a terrible close. . . and Cisco announces that they see "stabilization" thus feeding hope. The question is, will people now focus on valuation instead of hope? Or can that alone turn the market. . . and for how long? Totally fascinating to me, and I'm glad to be going along on this ride with all of you who are far smarter/savvier than I about how this all works. Oh, and you too, Allan, cuz I like your poetry. <g> the freep

To: Perspective who wrote (10887)	8/23/2001 9:26:48 PM
From: GraceZ	Respond to of 209892

lots more shorts are sitting on fat profits it's in short supply around most of the usual parties that orchestrate short squeezes I think that the first requirement is all that is really needed for up. That and some after the fact reason.

To: Perspective who wrote (10887)	8/23/2001 10:19:10 PM
From: Shack	Respond to of 209892

But squeezes require liquidity from somewhere, In a similar vein, M3 growth is now dead. It has a 6 week growth rate of 0%. The beast needs some food or it will die. AMG reported very modest equity fund inflows this week.

To: Perspective who wrote (10887)	8/24/2001 1:10:15 AM
From: jeffsthoughts	Respond to of 209892

Borcor - Thanks for this insight. It helped to confirm some of the value I have been deriving from EW. I had been questioning the validity of my views for awhile. This post made it into my bag of trading lessons and articles that I keep with my trading journal. I had to give it a title so I chose "Elliott Wave: Beyond the Counts". I hope that adequately conveys your intended message.