Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Strictly: Drilling II -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: re3 who wrote (529)	8/28/2001 2:51:40 AM
From: rails99	Respond to of 36161

Hi Ike: RGLD or FN? Suppose I agree on the not stats alone argument you make. Always get my butt kicked when I post in haste. I usually will look at the whole corp picture for financial info, debt load, yield, price, volume traded, chart action and other. My point is that the stats look good, the greater income per employee is a plus, the greater royalty income per employee of FN may jump yield up much faster than RGLD may see in the future, the royalty companies may outperform most of the other golds in the near term as RGLD has done to date, etc. Yes, I would always check out if the company is viable or not. All the above does lead me to say that the stats are impressive for FN versus RGLD. My guess is the price is the reason RGLD has jumped versus FN; as the players, on a daily basis, would go for the most shares to turn a profit, in this early bull of the PMs. Best Wishes; Rails