Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (24574)	8/24/2001 2:34:09 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Since you press on, I'll play. No, No, No. My point, and I know you didn't miss it, is that each situation is different. I don't see the parallel in your tale to what occurs on this thread.

To: E who wrote (24574)	8/24/2001 2:47:11 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 82486

There you go again.... JLA

To: E who wrote (24574)	8/24/2001 3:20:41 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

You've made the statement that Chris has made "demeaning cracks... about women of a certain age." He has refuted your charge. I'm requesting that you answer these questions. Just as a fellow SI-er, and seeker after truth and principle. 1) Were you right to say that? 2) Was Chris wrong to challenge the conclusion you had drawn and presented as an attribution? 3) Were your allies wrong not to defend your statement as 'fair comment,' and 'conclusion' based on 'extrapolation'? Just a simple Yes, Yes, Yes or whatever you deem appropriate will do. I look forward to your response.