SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (24592)8/24/2001 3:15:55 PM
From: E  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Yes, there are always mitigating circumstances for defending intentional lies or mere self-serving inaccuracies after they have been exposed.

The first you mention, embarrassment, is the main one going on here, imo.

But i personally don't consider it a good enough excuse.

How about doing me the favor of replying to my three amusing questions about the blonde, since you evidently defend bree's post. I'm curious to know whether you defend my blond's false attribution, too:

Message 16256702



To: Lane3 who wrote (24592)8/24/2001 3:20:42 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
It could even be that it was considered by the poster to be fair comment. A position I agree with. It could be the poster was offended by a difference of opinion being characterized as a "lie" given the body of posts the comment emanated from. Well, you get the idea....

JLA