Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joan Osland Graffius who wrote (75521)	8/24/2001 3:22:28 PM
From: Roebear	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116832

True enough Joan, but also a revival in the base metals won't hurt PM's a bit. Best, Roebear

To: Joan Osland Graffius who wrote (75521)	8/24/2001 3:28:18 PM
From: long-gone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116832

Then there is NEM? Perhaps no index movement tells the whole story. when those that don't know start buying gold they often buy the largest?

To: Joan Osland Graffius who wrote (75521)	8/24/2001 4:17:42 PM
From: Rarebird	Respond to of 116832

I'm well aware of the rise in PD and FCX today. But the Generals, PDG, ABX, and NEM, which were all up today in spite of the POG falling $2.70, are better leading indicators IMO for the POG than AEM, Glamis, Bema or Kinross. The Pros look at the Gold Stocks in the XAU First. The hardcore "Bugs" only take the HUI seriously. But then again, most of the "Bugs" unloaded their HM after the merger with ABX only to lose out on an additional 10% gain in HM thus far.