SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: fedhead who wrote (130537)8/25/2001 10:09:04 AM
From: H James Morris  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
>If Chamber's comment like business is
stabilizing can send the NAS up 73 points, what would happen
if business actually started improving.
So does this mean we should all be buying Cisco's competitors, like you suggested a few weeks ago?
Ciena, Onis, Sons were a few you mentioned.
Btw
Ciena lost 1/2 its value since we last discussed this topic.



To: fedhead who wrote (130537)8/25/2001 9:26:08 PM
From: craig crawford  Respond to of 164684
 
>> Why XLNX ? <<

that's what i'm asking. why is it so damn expensive?

>> If Chamber's comment like business is
stabilizing can send the NAS up 73 points, what would happen
if business actually started improving. <<

so what. the nasdaq was 64% off it's high and now it's 62% off it's high.



To: fedhead who wrote (130537)8/25/2001 10:41:17 PM
From: Victor Lazlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Chambers' comments are based on overseas 'bookings', who can verify that? Nobody. That's who.

remember, this is the clown who in late Dec., 2000 said everything was great, 50% growth as far as the eye could see.

Now you are going to put cash down on a PR by this guy? You're nuts.

He's a dope. Instead of experienced elec engineering and sales people who have been let go from CSCo, maybe Chambers should have been ousted. He's been asleep at the helm.