Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : T/FIF, a New Plateau -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Miljenko Zuanic who wrote (623)	8/26/2001 1:33:10 PM
From: scaram(o)uche	Respond to of 2243

Newbies, newbies, newbies all over the place!! There seems to be a sudden interest in the sector. Pointed to this........ Message 16195896 There is NOT ONE biotech thread in the top 50. Newbies....... I do not appreciate PMs at SI (excluding chit chat from friends). The only reason that I keep the mailbox open is that I have a friend here who doesn't use email.

To: Miljenko Zuanic who wrote (623)	8/26/2001 2:30:40 PM
From: tuck	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2243

Miljenko, No apologies needed; that was a joke intended to compliment your knowledge and experience in this area. I can understand why you wouldn't want to make it easy for us to follow your trades. It simply points out that most of us can't do as deep DD as you. Those of us in that category are pleased to see you show up at all! I'm starting to agree with you about clueless analysts on CCs. Not one question about the issue of blood infections with CA4P. Important, as you point out, because the risk/reward for patients in this population for this drug looked acceptable with just the cardiac and vascular issues. But throw in the systemic attacking of blood infections, and it's a different picture. Interesting, however, that this issue never showed up in the SI OXGN thread, though you apparently came across it in late May. There are few Yahoo! boards worth wading through, do we all have to do it? When one of us finds something of this import, couldn't it be shared to save the rest the trouble? I thought that's what these boards were for. If I had any problem here it was my own in not finding it by myself. But it would have been nice to be pointed at this earlier, is all. Raf inhibitor: tough target? Gotta bone up on the reasons . . . Cheers, and Thanks for Everything, Tuck PS: Does your cat really smoke? Not using the cat in NSCLC studies are you? It's a hilarious picture, whatever the case.