SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: CYBERKEN who wrote (174461)8/28/2001 11:19:01 AM
From: goldworldnet  Respond to of 769670
 
When Hansel becomes Gretel
By Debbie Schlussel © 2001 WorldNetDaily.com

Remember "Rocky Horror Picture Show"?

The overrated '70s film was anointed "campy," "cool," and a "cult classic," mostly because it features freaks and weirdoes – a transsexual singing rock music.

Unfortunately, that's no longer occult. It's the latest "in" thing. "Rocky Horror" is no longer horror. Bizarre-dom is now cool. And we're supposed to accept it as normal.

The latest offering in this ongoing campaign to make transsexuals the new minority is the movie, "Hedwig and the Angry Inch." The story of a transsexual rock-star wannabe, Hedwig was an East German boy whose mother and U.S. GI soldier boyfriend convince him to undergo a botched sex-change operation so the GI can marry him, bring him to the U.S., and then abandon him. In case you're wondering, the "Angry Inch," is all that's left between his legs. Hedwig goes on to corrupt and have an affair with a fundamentalist Christian teen-aged boy, the son of a minister, who lives in a trailer park.

Of course, an American serviceman fighting communism would be involved in this strange sexuality, sick "medical" operation and ultimate abandonment of this pathetic character. That's the way entertainment industry elitists see working-class enlisted U.S. military men who protect their freedom to make these sick films. It's also the way they make fun of religious Christians in America. After all, don't all fundamentalist Christians you've met live in a trailer park? Not that there's anything wrong with that unless you're an intolerant Hollywood snob living in a kajillion-dollar home in Malibu, looking down on mainstream and less-fortunate Americans.

Coupled with celebration of trans-sexualism, movie critics love this type of social propaganda. Normal middle-American values are abnormal, and abnormal transsexuals are mainstream.

Gear Magazine, a hip, macho guy's publication filled with sexy, scantily-clad women, raves about "Hedwig," calling it "the next great cult film." According to Gear's Michael Martin, "Internet pundits are calling Hedwig the best film of 2001, period."

Other critics are falling all over themselves to praise this dreadful film. The Wall Street Journal's usually reasonable Edward Jay Epstein says: "Hedwig" is "not to be missed." The New York Times' Stephen Holden calls it, "clever, funny, and wildly innovative!" Horribly loud musical trash, a bunch of silly platinum wigs and a lousy German accent are clever and wildly innovative? America's taste has really gone down the toilet.

Or are these critics just eager, as usual, to plug yet another politically-correct film, no matter how artistically bad it is? Probably. Why else would Rolling Stone's Peter Travers call this incredible agenda-filled waste of two hours "a cause for celebration"? "Hedwig" won the Sundance Film Festival's Audience Award and Best Director Award, which says a lot. "Boys Don't Cry," a similar cross-dressing propaganda film, won similar awards and shared the same producer, Killer Films.

As in, Killer of American Values.

That's the agenda here. "Hedwig" creator, openly gay John Cameron Mitchell, told the Detroit Free Press' Terry Lawson, he hopes "Hedwig's" real legacy "is that some kid out there who is confused as I was at that age will see it and realize there are more choices in life than he or she thought." His next film project is a children's story. Heaven help us. "Hedwig's" pre-sex change name is "Hansel." I can predict his children's film: "Hansel becomes Gretel," giving new meaning to "Grimm" Fairy Tales.

It wouldn't be so bad, if "Hedwig" were the only pop-culture effort to mainstream transsexuals. But it's part of a campaign. This fall, CBS will feature the first ever major transsexual TV character on "The Education of Max Bickford," starring Richard Dreyfuss as a college professor whose colleague undergoes a sex-change operation. In the '70s and '80s, TV shows celebrated Jews and blacks as its new minority cause. In the '90s, it was gays. And now, it's transsexuals? Amazing how a noble effort against ethnic and racial bigotry has degraded into tolerance of the absurd.

And this isn't your grandparents' innocent cross-dressing Uncle Milty or parents' Liberace with a pink feather boa. It's much more aggressive and dangerous. Today, kids are exposed to rock "artists" like Marilyn Manson – who, last week, was charged with criminal sexual conduct, stemming from masturbating his genitalia against a guard's head during a July Detroit-area concert. Next week, kids at New York's Eastchester High School will encounter art teacher Randey Gordon, the woman. Last year, he was art teacher Randey Gordon, the man. Ditto for Northbrook, Illinois' Glenbrook North High School, where a female science teacher will return to class as a man. Talk about weird science.

This political correctness isn't just weird – it's expensive and disruptive. To prepare for Gordon's return, she/he/it was given an entire year's leave, with pay, "so everybody could get used to the situation," Superintendent Bob Siebert said. The entire student body and their parents had to attend a meeting covering everything from privacy rights to bathroom use. "There was a lot of confusion." No kidding. "Diversity is something the world needs to understand and respect," Gordon preached. But where does diversity end? Pedophiles and bestiality are diverse, too.

In Wilmette, Illinois, middle school principal Donald Reed will return as Deanna Reed to share his new "look" with sixth graders. (Thankfully, he didn't pick "Donna Reed.") School Board member, Marilyn Horwitch said, "I certainly hope Dr. Reed will be happy." No mention of young students' well-being. It forced parents, like Jon Liberman, to teach their daughter about something they didn't expect to, and to be tolerant of the intolerable. "We're trying to be open-minded about it. This is the world today," he said. Thanks to "Hedwig's" reality.

"Don't be scared," says Hedwig's Mitchell. "Without deviance, there's no progress."

Wrong.

Defining deviancy down is the exact opposite of progress. It's regressive. And it's not campy. It's creepy.

worldnetdaily.com

* * *



To: CYBERKEN who wrote (174461)8/31/2001 11:11:22 AM
From: goldworldnet  Respond to of 769670
 
Court backs ban on gay adoption
Federal judge cites `legitimateinterest' of Florida

BY GAIL EPSTEIN NIEVES
gepstein@herald.com

A federal judge in Miami upheld Florida's ban against adoption by gay men and lesbians, ruling Thursday that the state has articulated a ``legitimate interest'' in placing children in homes with a married mother and father.

The decision leaves Florida as the only state that ``flat-out prohibits gay adoption under any circumstances,'' while Mississippi and Utah have more-limited restrictions, said Leslie Cooper, staff attorney with the ACLU's National Lesbian and Gay Rights Project and a lead counsel in the Florida challenge.

The American Civil Liberties Union, gay groups and some children's advocates expressed disappointment with the ruling, while the Department of Children & Families -- the agency that was sued by four gay men and two children -- said it agreed with the judge.

``We believe the statute is simply the irrational discrimination that is rooted in prejudice and hostility against gay people by members of our state Legislature,'' said Randall Marshall, legal director of the ACLU of Florida and a co-counsel in the case.

``The department agrees . . . that the federal court upheld the laws that the Legislature passed regarding this issue,'' Children & Families spokeswoman Cecka Green said in a statement.

In his 20-page opinion, U.S. District Judge James Lawrence King found that the plaintiffs had the burden ``as the one attacking the homosexual adoption provision to negate every conceivable basis which might support it.''

They did not meet that burden, he wrote, saying the plaintiffs ``left unchallenged [the state's] assertion that the best interest of the child is to be raised by a married family. It is unnecessary for this court to evaluate whether [the state's] statements are correct'' as long as they are ``arguable.''

The ACLU will file a motion for reconsideration and decide later whether to appeal, the ACLU's
Cooper said.

CHILD'S INTEREST

The Florida law at issue, adopted in 1977, is succinct: ``No person eligible to adopt under this statute may adopt if that person is a homosexual.''

The state said the law has two legitimate purposes: It reflects the state's moral disapproval of homosexuality, and it serves the best interest of Florida's children to be raised in a home stabilized by marriage between a mother and a father.

King rejected the first argument, writing, ``The court cannot accept that moral disapproval of homosexuals or homosexuality serves a legitimate state interest.''

But King did find a state interest in the second argument, noting that the state gives primary consideration for adoption to married heterosexual couples who can provide children with ``proper gender role modeling and minimize social stigmatization.''

``Plaintiffs have not asserted that they can demonstrate that homosexual families are equivalently stable, are able to provide proper gender identification, or are no more socially stigmatizing than married heterosexual families,'' King found.

The lawsuit was filed in May 1999 by the ACLU and the Children First project. It contended that the law works against the best interests of children and improperly excluded an entire group of otherwise qualified people from adopting.

It proceeded to court on behalf of three sets of plaintiffs: pediatric nurse Steven Lofton and John Doe, a foster child in his care since birth who is now 10; Miami's Douglas E. Houghton and John Roe, a child in his care since the age of 3 who is now 8 or 9; and partners Wayne Smith and Daniel Skahen of Key West, gay foster parents who would like to adopt.

MOVED TO OREGON

Reached Thursday by telephone in Oregon, where he now lives with a total of five foster children, Lofton declined to comment on the ruling.

Children & Families has already notified Lofton that it might take his foster son away, but Lofton's lawyers say they are hopeful they can keep that from happening.

While Florida bars adoption by gays and lesbians, it doesn't bar them from being foster parents.

Lofton and his partner, Roger Croteau, have cared for three Florida-placed foster children who tested positive for HIV at birth and two others they took in with Oregon's approval since moving there.

The two received an award as outstanding foster parents -- but they can't adopt those children in Florida.

Houghton, another plaintiff, took in little Oscar six years ago, when the boy was just 3 and his biological father couldn't care for him anymore.

Neither Houghton nor Smith and Skahen could be reached for comment.

``The fact that gay parents can be foster parents is an indication that the state is satisfied that it doesn't undermine their ability to provide a nurturing environment,'' said Daniella Levine, executive director of the Human Services Coalition of Dade County, which represents private service providers. She blasted the law as ``pure politics.''

In their arguments, the plaintiffs pointed out that despite the state's interest in placing children in married households, there is no prohibition against adoption by single heterosexuals in Florida. Fully 25 percent of adoptions statewide are by singles; that figure is 40 percent in Miami-Dade.

About 3,400 children are awaiting adoption in Florida.

`AT LEAST EXPLAIN'

``We still believe strongly that the state had the obligation to at least explain why the Legislature singled out lesbian and gay men and no other class of people when there's mounds of evidence that substance abusers and child abusers pose a serious threat to childrens' welfare, while you have no evidence that being gay poses a threat,'' said Cooper of the ACLU in New York.

Said Levine: ``It's unfair to the children who are waiting for homes. There are loving potential homes available, people who would pass all the tests. It's absurd to create a barrier that has no basis in fact.''

King, appointed as federal judge by President Nixon in 1970, has been at center stage in many of South Florida's most public legal dramas, from Court Broom and Iran-Contra to the civil award stemming from Cuba's shooting down of two Brothers to the Rescue planes.

He is perhaps most respected for his decisions on immigration cases. In 1980, King halted the mass deportation of Haitian refugees seeking asylum hearings, a decision which was upheld by the appellate court.

miami.com

* * *