Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MKT_entropy who wrote (24823)	8/27/2001 12:02:21 AM
From: golden_tee	Respond to of 27311

MKT, you have always been way too quick to throw criticism at everything VLNC does, albeit under the appearance of an industry guru. You may be a freaking genius compared to most of us on the chemistry of LiPoly batteries, but you have never demonstrated any ability to understand stocks, their movements, or anything about them. After all, that is the purpose of stock BB's. If you think Larry adds value here, I will just say that you are alone in that belief (shy of whatever posting aliases Larry can think up). Was my last post adolescent? Probably. Is Larry a loser by any societal definition... yes.

To: MKT_entropy who wrote (24823)	8/27/2001 12:05:12 AM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

MKT.E, don't worry, I'm not going anywhere. I find it a bit sad that certain infants posting here become so irate when someone posts a less-than bullish perspective. Its even sadder when these same infants know that my track record of posting here has been right on the money for years, while the track record of themselves, the internet touts of this stock, and the company itself has been miserable for years. If anything, I have been overoptimistic, not overpessimistic. I remember at the end of 1999, when the likes of FMK were predicting several dollars per share of earnings in 2000, I said I doubted whether they would earn more than 50 cents per share. A prediction for which I caught a similar amount of infantile crap from the likes of Yoest and Mark Johnson. My 50 cents per share (maximum) prediction turned out to be ridiculously overoptimistic; nevertheless I was blasted for making it. Having said that, it would be a much bigger loss if the thread lost your services. I only post public facts or my interpretations of those facts. I bring no special knowledge (other than an eye for detail) to the thread. Your posts as someone who knows something about the technology are far more valuable.