SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (52700)8/27/2001 11:13:40 PM
From: Ali ChenRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
"Does this make AMD's current process more advanced than Intel's? I don't think so when you consider AMD has to do it to stay 600MHz behind."

Maybe you also need to consider the 2x-simplified but
twice long pipeline of P4 before making this idiotic statement?



To: Elmer who wrote (52700)8/28/2001 12:34:24 PM
From: fyodor_Respond to of 275872
 
Elmer: I don't think so when you consider AMD has to do it to stay 600MHz behind.

Oh come on, Elmer. You're better than that!

On the one hand, you claim P4 is better because it scales to higher frequencies so easily.

On the other hand, you claim Intel's process is better because they can get P4 to higher frequencies so easily.

;-)

-fyo


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News