Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (52973)	8/29/2001 11:09:47 AM
From: Yousef	Respond to of 275872

Elmer, Re: "If some poor deranged individual is claiming it makes AMD's process superior then just chock it up to ignorance on his part and move on." It doesn't happen often, but I have to agree with you. <ggg> Make It So, Yousef

To: Elmer who wrote (52973)	8/29/2001 4:05:37 PM
From: Ali Chen	Respond to of 275872

"If some poor deranged individual is claiming it makes AMD's process superior then just chock it up to ignorance on his part and move on." The deranged individual has a friend who's significant other (EE PhD BTW) was working for Intel at a time when K6 arrived. Her word was that after the K6 chip was crossected and etched, Intel's process development individuals felt down from their chairs astounded by quality of interconnects and gates. Of course, they said that the design sucked (I guess they referred to 5-stage K6 micro-architecture, and I must agree), but not the manufacturing quality. So, chock it up and barf, individual.

To: Elmer who wrote (52973)	8/29/2001 9:22:55 PM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Re: If some poor deranged individual is claiming it makes AMD's process superior then just chock it up to ignorance on his part and move on. Er, weren't you the one claiming AMD was getting the same performance out of their .18 process as Intel will be getting from their .13?