Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (52995)	8/29/2001 12:34:57 PM
From: jjayxxxx	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

wanna_bmw, RE: IPCMHz formula The point is, AMD needs to do something* regardless of whether or not whatever they choose might backfire. I prefer going with The Truth (TM JJ), no matter how difficult it is to understand (even though I think a good ad campaign would make all the difference). A deceptive ploy, such as the model-hurtz scheme would probably do "okay". The difference is, AMD will get many more of the 'droids to go to bat for them (i.e. convince friends/family/neighbors to buy AMD, proudly brag of owning AMD processor, etc.) if they go with The Truth. If they try to cover up the real MHz with Modelhurtz, then many of the 'droids of the world will not only NOT go to bat for them, but they may jump ship themselves due to embarrasment. BWDIK, JJ