Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AK2004 who wrote (53070)	8/29/2001 6:41:38 PM
From: jcholewa	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 275872

> I see your point it and I agree that the problem was not > in the pr but rather that amd could not keep up. Either > way one should not go to variation of the scheme that > failed before That's a silly statement. :) Many people tried many times to make a heavier-than-air vehicle that could fly. They went through many variations, all of which failed, before they went out again and finally succeeded. Still, I do think that there are better approaches than performance rating. I kinda like using a more instruction-oriented objective number (like, for example, peak MIPS), and I liked most of all the idea of having a high core clock but just dividing everything. -JC