To: Maurice Winn who wrote (212 ) 8/30/2001 4:29:00 AM From: Theophile Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 586 Globalstar missed so many execution targets I could not understand how others stuck around for the finale. I know that many (such as QCOM) had no choice but to stick around, but individuals? Forsooth, why? Global Crossing has missed no executions, but similar to GSTRF the GX play has some big obstacles, debt being one of them. GX does *not* have an obstacle such as GSTRF had, whereby one of the partners-in-business clearly would prefer the company to die (speaking of VOD) rather than to succeed. <<<<>>>>>. Interesting post from a wireless thread, refers to SBC and Qwest, and demonstrates some of the extent of the telecom damage: "Mr Dykes said the carrier had also sold more than 40 per cent of its stake in long-distance operator Qwest Communications as part of its efforts to "redeploy resources". Analysts said they believed BellSouth was distancing itself from Qwest to pursue opportunities with its competitors and potential acquisition targets, once it received regulatory approval to offer nationwide long-distance services. BellSouth's international investments have been hit hard by a weak global economy, inflated valuations, extraordinary debts and technical obstacles, which have brought the once high-flying telecoms sector to its knees. Its stake in E-Plus, worth $12.6bn when the investment closed in February 2000, has lost 94 per cent of its value. The investment is exchangeable for 200m shares in Dutch carrier KPN, which owns the other 77.5 per cent stake in E-Plus. news.ft.com . So, Qwest sold off GX, and SBC sells off Qwest....and everyone is selling off ATT. The question remains, which ones have a possibility of recovery, even when the economy recovers ? SBC will do well, as they have a well developed plan for wireless. T? Q? WCOM? GX? GX is naught like GSTRF, Maurice. It is under the ocean, silly, not out in space. Martin