SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: wanna_bmw who wrote (53255)8/30/2001 4:50:53 PM
From: TenchusatsuRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
BMW, <You know, these numbers are conservative enough that Intel may not even call the foul. ... It makes up a little for AMD's lack of frequency, while not making it too obvious that AMD is still going for high end market share.>

That's just like saying it's better for a politician to twist the truth a little instead of telling a whopper. Or it's better for a fisherman to exaggerate the size of the fish he caught by 15% instead of 30%.

No matter what, this strategy will backfire exactly like John Fowler predicted. The conservativeness of the ModelHertz numbers is only a smokescreen covering AMD's true intention: to change the rules of the "MHz sells" game that they happen to be losing big time.

Tenchusatsu



To: wanna_bmw who wrote (53255)8/30/2001 5:06:48 PM
From: Milan ShahRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
The four Athlon XP processors will sport model numbers representing their relative performance when factoring in overall system performance. For example, the new Athlon XP 1500+ chip will equal a 1.33GHz processor. The 1600+ will equate to a 1.4GHz chip, the 1700+ will correspond to a 1.47GHz chip, and the 1800+ will equal a 1.53GHz processor, according to AMD

I just wish they had chosen to use the M and G letters instead of the pure numbers. I think its perfectly ok to market Athlon XP 1.7M and Athlon XP 2G chips.

Milan