Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : JDS Uniphase (JDSU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (21496)	8/30/2001 6:25:30 PM
From: RetiredNow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24042

Please! I don't think Clinton is responsible for this mess and I also don't think he was responsible for the good times. President's are one variable in billions that affect the stock market. To say that any President is responsible for how the stock market is doing is just plain naive. Greenspan on the other hand, has proven that he can make a difference. The problem is that the only difference he made was to tank the economy. He's finding out that destroying is much easier than creating too. There was an article about this posted yesterday or something. Anyway. Later.

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (21496)	8/31/2001 5:37:15 PM
From: Tunica Albuginea	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 24042

Dipy:Clinton. Let's get real. A recession takes months , years, to develop. Market bottomed April 2001, 3 months after Bush was in. He couldn't have done it even if he tried. . . Clearly it is Clinton's high taxes that helped smolder the economy. Add to that his fueling of healthcare inflation by limiting health care to lousy HMOs that now nobody wants. Everybody wants cheap good private health and you are not going to get it in just the next 2 or 3 years. . . . What else good has Clinton done? My count so far is zero TA