SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (176256)8/30/2001 7:47:25 PM
From: American Spirit  Respond to of 769670
 
Starr spent 100 million not 50. And came up with zilch except the sex life which wasn't supposed to be the point of it but gave the GOP what they really wanted, a flaw to point to and distract Americans from the fact Clinton was the most successful president we'll ever see. And it wasn't just luck. If they spent 100 million investigating Bush they'd find things that would turn off even the most ardent right-wingers. They'd also found he's done little or nothing for anyone in his life but himself and his cronies.



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (176256)8/30/2001 7:52:52 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Ah! The "you're one too!" defense. Good! Very good! PM your post to TLC; I'm sure he can fit you into his movie. Maybe you can get the part of the sneaky agent provacateur who sets off all the trouble.

But you know something? If you did go after Bush, I doubt that you'd come up with 43 associates that are felons.

You're just pissed because your hero got caught with his pants down. Literally.



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (176256)8/30/2001 8:45:29 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Respond to of 769670
 
Patrica, no matter how much money you spend you will not find any woman with a smashed in face from as mr. bill spokes person said "consensual sex". what are mr. bill's and mr. gary's addictions.

tom watson tosiwmee



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (176256)8/31/2001 9:09:28 AM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 769670
 
Probable cause???