To: Square_Dealings who wrote (75754 ) 9/1/2001 11:49:47 AM From: IngotWeTrust Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116753 Your response is tallied to the What is MW's definition of a Gata win. Thank you. *************** Now: about your personal assessment RE me being emotional about GATA: I bring logic to the table and you males don't like it one iota. Because I'm a woman, you can't handle it, and trot out the old "emotional" and or/pre- or post menstrual line. How predicatble. I'm.not emotional about GATA...just STILL asking hard questions about glaring inconsistencies... and furthermore have a public track record of asking GATA Bill--personally, and this now forum's GATA THEORY supporters since he fled with his tail between his legs about June of 99-- the hard GATA FISCAL questions since about Jan 1999. You wouldn't know that since you weren't here back then. And, as Hutch duly noted, Bill left this public accountability discussion primarily as the result of "nerdy" questions about GATA's fiscal responsibility both on the income side as well as the expenditure side. If I were a man asking these questions, I'd be called an "bottom's up analyst, or perhaps an "auditor" I just follow the money and try to track the logic and find it GATALACKEY lacking. GATA is NOT fiscally transparent anymore than the global institutions they are pursuing are transparent in their gold dealings. Quid Pro Quo? Not w/me...it just doesn't wash. I've put forth several logical arguments in this debate over POG--with my PRO GOLD/CHEAP GOLD IS PLENTIFUL bias clearly known by all who read me. Please re-adjust your re-view mirror with facts. That's why I posted the old Smurf and ak ak posts...to provide this forum with historical facts. Forget emotions, MW, just follow the money...Bill's Money, Gata's Donation Money, and any "out of court settlement" or hail mary bleed the bastards dry hoped for judge/jury award. SHOW ME THE MONEY, Michael Finsterwald. Can I/it get any more logical than this? .