SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (142677)9/4/2001 10:21:13 AM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Jim, "Real Estate is the only thing holding up the economy.
I'm still not understanding how you can blame Greenspan..."

Jim, I am confused.
How housing can possibly hold anything if it does not
produce any tradeable goods? Someone have to pay for
construction, is not it? Who would eventually pay off
mortgage if most people will lose their jobs in
manufacturing areas? And does not AG eventually
provides for loans which likely be not repaid?

- Ali



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (142677)9/4/2001 1:12:28 PM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Lawrence Kudlow has it right, as he has all along. He warned against raising too far, and not starting to cut. The Y2K thing may have given a shot to computer sales, but how would it have also caused the boom in telecom, networks, storage, etc. OK, secondariy with storage because everyone was backing up everything twice. Greenspan lives in the 70s mentally. Then, we had the double digit inflation, but there were never any signs of even 5% recently. We should have had a slowdown in computer spending after Y2K, but not an off the cliff effect. Also, were the approaching 1,000,000 job cuts in tech warranted because of this guy's 1970s fears?

Time for a change. Bob Brinker, long time supporter of AG, and pretty good caller of market trends, on average, can only say recently that Greenspan is "out of it."

Tony