SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (15575)9/4/2001 12:00:30 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 59480
 
Tax avoidance refers to the perfectly legal practice of using the tax laws to minimize your tax liability. Giving advice in tax avoidance is a trillion dollar industry (which is enough alone to insure that the tax code will remain unjust).

But you are correct, the fear of punishment causes many to eschew tax avoidance and thereby pay more tax than they should, just to remove the risk of entangling themselves with the coercive, potentially abusive, tax collection bureaucracy.

Perhaps some people refrain from tax avoidance due to the fear of sanctions, but most of us are just law abiding citizens.........



To: Neocon who wrote (15575)9/4/2001 12:15:08 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 59480
 
You analogy of purse snatching with tax evasion is inapt for several reasons.

The vast majority of citizens believe the state should enforce laws against theft, especially theft accompanied by assault.

I contend the vast majority of citizens think the Federal tax laws are unjust, for very good reason - they are.

I don't practice nor recommend tax evasion. That is wrong. I cite the widespread predilection for doing it as evidence that the tax laws are corrupt and unjust. The fact that the unjust tax laws go uncorrected year after year despite the demand of citizens for relief is disturbing evidence that our Representative Democracy, in this case, is NOT working.