Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mu Gamma Lambda -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (5406)	9/4/2001 6:03:38 PM
From: Original Mad Dog	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10077

Somewhere in here, depending on how you measure it, the Naz may very well recover and resume its long term (pre-1999) trend line: stockcharts.com[w,a]macayymy[d19900101,20010904][pb200!b][vc60][iUb14!La12,26,9] I think the time is near, or here, to make some prudent long term bets. 1400 is a distinct possibility here, but if we don't see 2500 or even 3000 in the next three years I would be surprised. But only place long term bets on stocks that pass stability and financial integrity screens, however you choose to define them.

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (5406)	9/4/2001 6:19:08 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10077

>>Today was a serious ugly in what could a month of serious ugly's! Fear factor = High! << Sometimes fear is a good thing. <g> The big FEAR right now as I see it is over-capacity and slowing demand. As Jorj pointed out earlier, we should see more consolidation and elimination of the weaker players, which should help, but until we get a clearer picture of the next earnings growth cycle, it's kinda tough sledding deciding which P to pay for that E. <edit> I see that OMD has also address the valuation issue and the "smoke and mirrors" of accounting that may be coming home to roost. I concur with you, OMD. This is like the "cock roach" theory on steroids. <vbg>